Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR P•'IEETING OF TIiE OROP10 COUPICIL, FEBRUARY 23, 19.78 Page 17 <br /> From my understanding of the circur►stances of this SUBDIVISION <br /> proposal, I feel that the best interests of the 3024 Casco Point Road <br /> community and the neighborhood surrounding the (Continued) <br /> proposed subdivided lot would be best served by <br /> disapproving any subdivision that would require <br /> zoning variances for residential construction. <br /> End of letter <br /> Mayor Van rdest: Has Pir. Plowrian siqned a contract <br /> with t4r. Braun? <br /> P4r. Schnell: Yes, but there is a legal dispute <br /> between them concerning the finalization of all <br /> data. <br /> Mayor Van rdest: I�as �he City delayed this request? <br /> Pdr. Schnell: P1o, but I question the one year . " <br /> statute of limitation and its legality. <br /> Mayor Van Nest: It took a year and three months <br /> to get soil tests and from June to October, 1976 , <br /> nothing happened. <br /> Mr. Olson read a letter from rir. Muhich to Dick <br /> Benson, dated P�Iarch 13, 1975, which states: <br /> i4r. Braun is rec�uesting approval of a simple sub- <br /> division of Tract T of R.L.S. #461 on Casco Point <br /> into two parcels. <br /> At present, one house is located on the parcel <br /> which exceeds one acre in area. This area is . <br /> zoned LR-1C (single family 1/2 acre sewered) . _ <br /> The proposed lot split would result in two parcels <br /> both of which would exceed the required 1/2 acre <br /> minimum area. �he �•�icith of the t��o nro�osed .�ots <br /> would also exceec3 tlie rainimurti o� 100 ft. at the <br /> location of the house if the second home is built <br /> 150 ' fror.m the lagoon. <br /> The second building site to the southwest o.f the <br /> existing dwelling is c�uite a bit lower in elevation <br /> than the existing structure site, however. <br /> If the proposal were to be approved, the applicant <br /> should be rerninded that soil tests would be required <br /> to assure us conditions are satisfactory. <br /> March 18, 1975 <br /> At their meeting of P�arch 17, 1975, the Planning <br /> Commission recommended approval of this subdivision <br /> to Council. <br /> End of letter (Continued) <br />