Laserfiche WebLink
REGUT AR 21EETIIJG OF TFiE OROIJO COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 2 3, 19 7 8 Page 12 <br /> - Chronological Review SUBDIVISION <br /> 3024 Casco Po�nt Road <br /> (Continued) <br /> 'ebruary 25, 1975 - First application, "simple division" <br /> N,arch 17 , 1975 - Planning Commission approval without public hearing <br /> June 28, 1976 - Council approved final plat subject to ,52000 park <br /> fee and engineer' s review of drainage - no resolu- ' <br /> . tion at this time <br /> July 30, 1976 - Braun engineering soil tests <br /> October ?_6, 1976 - Building permit application - applicant notified <br /> that permit would be held until subdivision finalized <br /> no drainage plan submitted <br /> October 18, 1977 - Applicant returned to have plats signed. He offered <br /> to pay park fee, but submitted no drainage plans. <br /> Resolutions are now required for final plat approval. <br /> Sorne ordinances interpretations may have changed <br /> . since June 1976. Staff referred applicant to City <br /> Council. <br /> October 24, 1977 - Council referred applicant to Planning Commission <br /> for review. <br /> December S, 1977 - Planning Commission requested staff to call a Public <br /> Hearing <br /> January 16, 1978 - Public Hearing. Planning Commission recommended <br /> denial on basis of drainage problems and 50�, width <br /> variance on shoreline. Specifically asked Council <br /> to consider the applicant' s delays when considering <br /> . the original approval of the current requirements . <br /> January 23, 1978 - Scheduled for Council agenda - tabled by request <br /> of applicant <br /> January 24, 1978 - Staff received applicant' s drainage plan. <br /> February 9, 1978 - �taff expects letter from City Engineer regards <br /> ' _rainage. - <br /> . Council could approve subdivision based upon: <br /> � Each lot exceeds '-� acre minimum area 22,000 s f. �- " <br /> 23,000 sf. <br /> Lot width variance was previously approved and is <br /> not totally inconsistent with the neighboring <br /> property. � <br /> Same neig:z:�orhoo3 objections are on file. <br /> The drainage and structural conditions can be <br /> properly engineered. <br /> The Council could deny the subdivision based upon: <br /> The Planning Commission recommendation for denial <br /> The lot width variance at the shoreline <br /> The lack of detailed drainage and erosion control <br /> plans. <br /> . Note the following: <br /> Tract T was divided for tax purposes in 1975 <br /> (apparently after Council approval, but obviously <br /> before plat recording) Parcel 6050, the half <br /> listed to Steve Plow-man, is listed in our records <br /> as tax delinquent for 1976 and 1977. <br /> (Cc�ntinued) <br />