Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE OROPJO COUNCIL, FEBRUARY 23, 1978 Page 10 <br /> These shortcuts make it impossible for staff to SUBDIVISION <br /> prepare adequate reports. Without public hearings, 3024 Casco Point Road <br /> we lose the necessary input from the general (Continued) <br /> public. More tines than not we all end up with <br /> headaches. This is one of those headaches ! <br /> Although this lot split was previously approved, <br /> I would suggest we reconsider before we finalize <br /> the project. The original simple subdivision <br /> apPlication was submitted on February 25, 1975 <br /> (only one month after application was submitted) . <br /> Although A1 Olson ' s memo dated October 18, 1977, <br /> states that we should evaluate the low drainage area <br /> and soil conditions , you will note on my original <br /> memo dated P4arch 13, 1975, I indicated these same <br /> points. I included two photos of the low drainage <br /> area. I also Met on the site with John Gerhardson <br /> and he felt the drainage could be _directed so as � <br /> to not interfere with the neighbor. I also obtained <br /> letter of no objection from several of the neighbors. <br /> Neither the Planning Commission nor the Council <br /> addressed these points when they were brought to <br /> their attention. The conditions of soils is not <br /> the responsibility of staff at the tiMe building <br /> permits are issued. Foundations and supports of <br /> structures are determined by the soil conditions. <br /> If soil conditions are questionable, we require <br /> soil borings and recorunendations from engineers <br /> to prevent failure of structure. <br /> One year and three nonths after obtaining City <br /> approval of the proposed lot split, P�ir. Braun <br /> and Mr. Plo�,�man retuYned with the necessary mylar <br /> and hardshells for fi: al approval (June 28, 1976) . <br /> Council approved the final plat subject to a park <br /> dedication fee of $2 ,000 and engineer' s approved <br /> drainage plans. Since that time, we have heard <br /> nothing. Until now, one year and four months <br /> later. <br /> They are requesting approval of the final plat. <br /> Since the statue of limitations has expired and <br /> our policies and procedures have changed some- <br /> what, I would suggest re-evaluation of the <br /> proposal. <br /> Planning Commission Pieeting - November 7, 1977 <br /> Mr. Steve Plowrtan and his attorney were present. <br /> The Planning Corirlission directed staff to schedule <br /> a public hearing for earliest date possible. <br /> Zoning Administrator informed Planning Corunission <br /> and applicant that certified list of owners within <br /> 300 ft. would have to be provided by applicant <br /> before public hearing could be scheduled. (Continued) <br />