Laserfiche WebLink
. � ' -5- , ' . Page 36 <br /> PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE <br /> . 1978 1979 1980 <br /> Preliminary Application • ** <br /> Final Application *** <br /> Planning ** *� <br /> Operator Selection • * * <br /> Marketing * _ <br /> Demonstration * *** ***** <br /> Evaluation ** ( <br /> PUBLIC TRANSIT SCHEDULE <br /> In that this paratransit proposal is intended to complenent the existi�g <br /> regular route transit system, no changes are anticipated in the service <br /> levels and hours of operation of the regular transit service during the <br /> demonstration. It is, however, assumed that reco�endations for reqular <br /> route� service level changes would result as part of the de�onstration's <br /> evaluation. . <br /> COMPATIBILITY <br /> In that these vans can operate on any of the roads in the Minnetonka <br /> Area, the routes will be designed to serve areas not now bei.ng served by <br /> regular transit; such that this paratransit service shouZd complement <br /> regular transit as well as providing a collection and distribution service <br /> for regular transit_ <br /> CONTINUATION POTENTIAL . - <br /> The proposed paratransit fare structure cannot of=set the estimated <br /> operating costs so that a continuing subsidy would be necessary. Near <br /> the completion of the demonstration, an e�aluation will be made to: <br /> l. Dete�ine whether or not subsequer.� subsidies justify <br /> the social benefits afforded by the paratransit system. <br /> 2. Determine whetner or not regular transit pa�onage has or <br /> Wlll increase bP_CdllSP_ of thi c r.araTr�n�i+ �e..�........ <br />