Laserfiche WebLink
� REGULAR r1EETING OF THE ORONO COUPICIL, NOVEP4BER 28, 1977 Page 18 <br /> � From the sketch submitted, there is no way to VARIANCE <br /> confirr,i dimensions as they are not certified. 4045� Watertown Road <br /> �herefore, I cannot determine the extent of (Continued) <br /> � ariances necessary. <br /> � If the property consists of 5 acres, an area <br /> variance would not be required. From his sketch, <br /> � it appears the lot is 30 ft. short of required <br /> width. The proposed location of the garage would <br /> A require a 25 ft. variance from the necessary 100' <br /> • setback. <br /> I explained to Mr. Dorn that we could process the <br /> � variance request based on the enclosed sketch. <br /> � However, a survey would be required for issuing <br /> a building permit as staff would be unable to <br /> • confirr.i location without at least a partial <br /> certified survey of the front portion of his <br /> � property. <br /> * Two other property owners located slightly east <br /> * of the Dorn property are also up for variance <br /> consideration at this same meeting. Both have <br /> submitted surveys, as I requested. We could " <br /> process this application in the same manner as <br /> Mr. Hankinson on Carman Road and include the <br /> condition of applicant submitting survey to <br /> �onfirm �ocation. <br /> � Planning Commission PZeeting - Pdovember 7, 1977 <br /> � <br /> No representative of applicant present. Planning <br /> � Commission tabled proposal for lack of representati�n. <br /> Review proposal -- appeared to indicate approval of <br /> • concept if all dimensions could be verified. <br /> ` Directed staff inform applicant at least a partial � <br /> sur��ey would be necessary before the Commission <br /> � could r.iake a definite determination of the extent <br /> of variance Commission was considering. <br /> � <br /> Planning Commission PZeeting - November 21, 1977 <br /> � - <br /> Mr. & P4rs. Dorn were present. Discussed requirement <br /> � of certified survey. Planning Commission recomr.lended <br /> • approval subject to following conditions: <br /> � 1. Garage setback from street approved to a maximum <br /> of 60 ft. <br /> � 2. Applicant providing certification of location in <br /> relation to lot lines to verify location. <br /> � <br /> Justifications : <br /> � <br /> Topgraphy of land <br /> 2. Proposed setback exceeds existing house setback <br /> � 3. Utilize existing driveway (Continued) <br /> � <br /> i <br />