Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR M�ETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, P10VEMBER 28, 1977 Page 17 <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning SUBDIVISION <br /> Adrninistrator, entered into the record the 2340 Fox Street <br />�ollowing concerning the subdivision for William #278 <br /> elley, 2340 Fox Street, dated November 21, 1977, Bill Kelley <br /> which states: ' <br /> Bruce Kelley was present. Planning Commission <br /> recommended approval of final plat subject to the <br /> following conditions: <br /> 1. Approval of utility and drainage easements by <br /> City Engineer and Attorney- <br />�, 2. Approval of description and method of providing <br /> necessary flowage and conservation easer_tents <br /> over wetlands area by City Engineer and Attorney. <br /> 3. Title opinion addressed to City and approved . <br /> by City Attorney. <br /> 4. Park dedication fee of $1, 000 ($250 per lot) . <br /> Council Meeting Nover.iber 28, 1977 <br /> Butler moved, Massengale seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #856 <br /> #856 , A Resolution Conceptually Approving Bill Kelley' s Bill Kelley' s Land <br /> Land, subject to adding, "Upon completion of these Conceptual <br />. items, Resolution #857 will be certified and may be <br /> filed c�ith the Hennepin County Recorder' s Office. " . <br /> Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> �iayor Van rdest moved, Butler seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION #857 <br /> Resolution #857, A Resolution Approving Bill Bill Kelley' s Land <br /> Kelley' s Land, subject to adding, c�ncurrent <br />, filing of a flowage and conservation easement to <br /> the City of Orono over parts of Lots 3 & 4 as <br /> described therein. P�otion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning VARIANCE <br />` Adr.linistrator, entered into the record the 4045 Watertown Road <br /> following variance request of Earl Dorn, 4045 #329 <br /> Watertown Road, dated October 13, 1977, which Earl Dorn <br /> states: <br /> Mr. Dorn is requesting a building permit to <br /> construct a detached 24 ' X 24 ' garage on his <br /> residential property. I informed him that a <br /> survey was required before we could determine <br /> whether his proposal would comply with the <br /> current zoning requirements. He felt this <br /> was not necessary. He has substituted the <br /> enclosed property sketch. The dimensions as <br /> noted, I believe, are estimates so �ve cannot <br /> determine actual variances that r.iight be necessary. <br /> he zoning requirements in this district are: <br /> Area - 5 acres; width - 300 ' ; front setback - 100' ; <br /> side setback - 50' . (Continued) <br />