Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> �RO310 CUUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 14, 1977 Page 45 <br /> `After reviewing Mr. Bonner' s letter, Councilmember SKI-TONKA <br /> Walter Massengale informed Mr. Bonner that part (Continued) <br /> the context of the letter was incorrect and <br /> at the City of Orono does not consider Phase I <br /> �and Phase II as a single operation, and the <br /> �record should be cleared to that effect. Further- <br /> more, efforts have not been made by the applicant <br /> �to apply for a Phase II application. Councilmember <br /> Massengale continued by stating that an engineer <br /> �that is going to be provided to complete the � <br /> inspection has to be qualified in ski operations <br /> �nd safety devices related to that operation. in <br /> orc�er to assure the City that the safety, health <br /> �and welfare of the patrons of Ski-Tonka is provided <br /> �or. <br /> �Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to extend the Phase I <br /> temporary license for Ski-Tonka until February 28, <br /> M1977, when at that time, a satisfactory inspection <br /> of Phase I of Ski-Tonka will be performed by a <br /> �ualified engineer. Furthermore, Phase II has to <br /> �e considered as a separate application which has <br /> o be applied for through the Building & Zoning <br /> �epartment which will then go to the Planning <br /> Commission for their review and recommendation. <br /> �Iotion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> � <br /> �utler moved, to approve as per Planning Commission RIPRAP PERMIT <br /> `ecommendations the riprap and seawall request of 2975 Casco Point Road <br /> Stewart Perry, 2975 Casco Point Road. P-Zotion <br /> failed for lack of second. <br /> �. Alan P. Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning <br /> �dr�inistrator, stated that the application of <br /> tewart Perry, 2975 Casco Point Road, is before <br /> e City to review work that was done without <br /> ouncil authorization as required by 31. 700. <br /> �e last action by Council was June 14, 1976, <br /> when Mr. Perry was advised that the retaining <br /> �11 portion of the work was reluctantly approved, <br /> but that the seawall must be removed. The <br /> �closed correspondence followed, and then <br /> Perry was tagged for non-compliance to 31. 700 <br /> September 8, 1976. The matter was before the <br /> '`-inicipal Court on January 18, 1977 for a pre-trial <br /> hearing at which time Mr. Perry suggested a compromise. <br /> � <br /> � (Continu�d) <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />