Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � OROi10 COUNCIL P�EETING HELD FEBRUARY 14, 1977 Page 40 <br /> � The engineer evidently considered the combination VARIANCE <br /> of the four lots as one complete building site. 469 Tonkawa Road <br /> The property (all four lots) has been assessed (Continued) <br /> � one unit charge of $3, 859.04 and 100 ft. of <br /> lateral, charge of $1, 830.00 for a total of <br /> � $5, 689.04. <br /> � The proposed location of the dwelling would meet <br /> all setback requirements. We should make certain <br /> ` a garage is included in the plan so no variances <br /> would be requested for any future garages or <br /> � other structures. <br /> � The original proposal also indicated a driveway <br /> � toward the north half of the parcel. After <br /> informing the applicant the County would have <br /> r to approve access onto a County road, he has <br /> reversed the house plan in order to locate the <br /> i driveway further toward the south to improve the <br /> problem of sight distance as indicated in the <br /> S enclosed County Highway report. We might consider <br /> � noting an exact dimension for locating the drive- <br /> way to assure us of the safety suggestion by the <br /> � County Highway Department. <br /> � After reviewing the proposal and County Highway <br /> Department suggestions, I believe we should <br /> • require a contour map of the property indicating ' <br /> • existing and proposed elevations so the County <br /> can review the proposed drainage pattern before <br /> � any building permit might be issued. 4�Ie could <br /> defer preparation of the topographical map until <br /> � such time we determine whether we should approve <br /> the variances. <br /> • <br /> Planning Commission Meeting - February 7, 1977 <br /> • <br /> � Recommended approval subject to the following <br /> conditiions: <br /> A l. Combination of all four lots. <br /> � 2. Pdew structure to include garage to eliminate <br /> any probler_i with garage location in the future. <br /> • 3. Proposed structure meet all setback requirements. <br /> • 4. Reverse house plan to provide greater sight <br /> distance from driveway access along County Road <br /> � #135 - (locate driveway access as close as possible <br /> to south property line) . <br /> � 5. Submit topo map with existing and proposed elevations. <br /> 6. Submit drainage plan agreeable to County Public <br /> • Works Department. <br /> 7. County approval of driveway access. <br /> • <br /> �Justifications: <br /> ` 1. Combined parcel similar in size to contiguous <br /> properties. <br /> � 2. Four parcels combined have been assessed one <br /> � complete sewer assessment. (Continued) <br />