My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-1977 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1977
>
05-23-1977 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2015 4:04:02 PM
Creation date
4/20/2015 4:03:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' Page 37 <br /> � � � T�iembers of the Orono City Council May 23, 1977 <br /> � would by $2057 and the loss to Orono would be $618 , or about 1/3 of <br /> � Long Lake ' s loss . Actually , neither would lose this much compared <br /> to 1975 because of increased water consumption at the school during <br /> 1976 . <br /> � If we utilize our metered 1976 water consumption figures for <br /> . our three schools and include both city water and well water, •we would <br /> have 13 , 313 , 000 -gaiions. When- our �aell - is- phased -out�- if-we �tay-at <br /> � the same 1. 17 rate , the school' s cost for water would skyrocket to <br /> $9 , 829 . If the Long Lake rate drops to 4�� and Orono decides to allow <br /> � th e 30g charge to remain (instead of increasing it to 60�) the school ' s <br /> cost would be $4914 annually (rate 45� + 13 . 5�)� with Long Lake re- <br /> � ceiving $3780 and Orono receiving $1134 . IN OTHER WORDS, FOR A <br /> PRESENT REDUCTION OF ABOUT $600 IN YOUR AD29INISTRATIVE AND MAINTENANCE <br /> CHARGES, THE CITY OF ORONO WOULD BE ASSURING THE SCHOOL AN EVENTUAL � <br /> � SAVINGS OF CLOSE TO $5 , 000 ANNUALLY. FURTHERMORE THE CITY OF ORONO <br /> WOULD EVENTUALLY SEE ITS CURRENT- R�VENUES REINSTATED DUE TO THE <br /> � ADDITION OF THE TWO SCHOOLS. . " <br /> � � SEtaER RATES <br /> � We also understand that your administration is recommending the <br /> � school district' s present $1..17 per M �gallon. sewer charge .be increased <br /> to $1 . 50 per M gallons . This constitutes approximately a 20o increase <br /> � for us which is beyond our ability to fund without a reduction in ' <br /> educational offerings . <br /> • The new rate is computed by using as a basis a household average <br /> of 15 , 000 gallons per quarter at a charge of $22 . 50 or $1. 50 per M <br /> � gallons. We do not feel- this to be a fair and equitable basis on <br /> which --�o- r3etermir�e the school-'s aharge--wher� our annual flowage -approxi- <br /> � mates S million gallons_ There should�e some consideration given for <br /> volume users. We feel that the council should hold the �resent rate to <br /> � the school at $1. 17 per M gallons and then see what can be done to <br /> • lower the rate to a level which compares favorably with average area <br /> costs. <br /> • The school board directed that a study be undertaken of area <br /> � municipalities to dete rmine average rates being charged for water and <br /> sewer. We have brought copies for each of you tonight. _ <br /> � <br /> • , For volume users, water ranges from 35� per M in Wayzata to 65� ' <br /> per M in Minnistrista, with tl�e average water charge 42 . 8$ per M <br /> . c�allons. THE REDUCTION TO 45� PER M GALI,�ONS PLUS A 13. 5$ OVERRIDE <br /> BY ORONO WOULD STILL PLACE US ABOUT 16� OVE� THE AREA AVERAGE. Sewer <br /> � rates vary from 50 . 5 � per M gallons at Maple Plain to 83� per M gal3.ons <br /> in Minnistrista, with the average being 69 . 4 per M gallons. At the <br /> � present rate of $1. 17 per M gallons charges by Orono for sewer, we <br /> • are 1. 68 times the area average . <br /> CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY <br /> � We understand and appreciate your City administrator' s concerns <br /> for gaining all possible revenues. This is their job_ Tae , on the <br /> � <br /> � . , - - <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.