Laserfiche WebLink
� ' <br /> � •REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, MAY 23, 1977 Page 24 <br /> � 2. The Review Board will act on all appeals from ZONING VARIANCE <br /> Zoning Administrator decisions and on all PROCEDURES <br /> � other residential variance requests (except (Continued) <br /> ' lakeshore and wetlands requirements) . Applicants <br /> may request, in writing, appeal of any Review <br /> ;� Board decision to the Planning Comr►ission, or <br /> the Board may require review of any application <br /> S by the Planning Commission. <br /> � 3. The Planning Commission will review all appeals <br /> a from the Review Board and will continue to <br /> review all variances for lakeshore and wetlands <br /> a requirements and for all multi-family, commercial <br /> and industrial proposals. As now, all Planning <br /> , Commission recommendations will go to the <br /> Council for final action. <br /> � <br /> 4. Plotice of any variances acted upon by the <br /> � Zoning Administrator or the Review Board will <br /> • be sent to the Planning Commission and the <br /> Council for their information. <br /> � P�ayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to give <br /> � conceptual approval of the Zoning Variances <br /> Procedures and to appoint Councilmember P�ary <br /> � Butler as a member of a two-member Review Roard (other <br /> • member from the Planning Commission) to determine <br /> �nd review procedures with staff for final Council <br /> � _eview. 1�4otion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> The City Council was informed that the Platting PLATTIrdG ORDINANCE <br /> � Ordinance was being retyped and would be avail- <br /> able for the June 13, 1977 Council meeting. <br /> � <br /> � Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, REVISED FEE SCHEDULE <br /> i read into the record proposed fee schedule <br /> revisions, as follows : <br /> • <br /> Staff recommends that the fee schedule established <br /> � for review and administration of applicant-originated <br /> projects be updated to more clearly reflect the <br /> � costs incurred by the City staff and consultants <br /> � engaged in enforcing the City' s codes and <br /> ordinances. In addition, it is recommended that <br /> � the revised schedule be adopted in resolution <br /> form so as to be easily amended in the future. <br /> • <br /> All the ordinance revisions now in draft form <br /> � refer to separately established fees, rather <br /> ! than specific dollar amounts rigidly written <br /> into obscure corners of each separate ordinance. <br /> �stablishment of this type of schedule will require <br /> an ordinance to amend all the existing sections <br /> � specifying separate fees. <br /> (Continued) <br /> � <br /> � <br />