Laserfiche WebLink
�'i.�t ori a G:nin C�-���-ry <br /> c �,c 1•.:s,on �:' • ,.� �ag� 18 � <br /> ��- . � .• �1�:,-:�,.�ry) � � �'�� �� ',`- , � <br /> � 3 �� � � <br /> ? ; P � ��,p � ��- r: �[♦ � <br /> s`�V i� � <br /> � `�' � 4 <br /> � <br /> � hiler.s�.y an� I r�t cn April 5, 1977_ I r�arked one of the p]ans in his presence to <br /> �i e l�;,e a t e t h e s e a r�a s. M r. F-a c�;i n g's le t ter cat e d 4-1 2-7 7 indicates another mis- <br /> un��erst�ing by �r, h'ilensky. Zhe last sentence of t},e first para�--aph refers to a <br /> �,�.-�;ly propose-d c}:annel. I certainly w�uldn't suggest a d�ging project of this <br /> �,1s�n1�ude• T71e rr,�3�n gurpose for this additional engineering data �•as reouir�-d to <br /> �-�u�e d;ed in to a mini_rm.un + <br /> S� g (capy of N,r. Hacku�g s Ietten enclosed) , <br /> �i.",FF - "�ril 14, 1977 <br /> ! <br /> '� ��.;e�d }�fr. Nacl:ing's Ietter with a r,�p clelineating ar-e�s for more engir,ezring (copy <br /> �f 1 e�ter r.�-1d �ap enclosed) , _ <br /> �i ter resp��ding to Mr. tiacking's letter, I received another today dated April 13 1977. <br /> ��st be try-ing to build up a record. ' <br /> S�.'.I�'F - April 18, 1977 <br /> � reviewed the airrent tax status of the subject praperties and fotmd the follo-w�ng. <br /> ;�ese value estirrates were made by the assessor in 1970. <br /> � <br /> � (1) The S�11 er Parcel (RLS A 158) _ <br /> Esti:�a�ed Area - 10.7 acres <br /> r Esti�ated Wetlands Area by assessor - 8 acres <br /> � T�.arket ��alue - �15,000 <br /> Limited V�1ue - S8,200 <br /> � (2) The I,drge Parcel (RLS �924 - Tract B) <br /> � Estimated Area - 31 acres <br /> ' Estirrated Dry Buildable Area by assessor - 12 acres <br /> ;�`.arket �'aluP including sr,all building - $63,700 <br /> � Lia-�ited �%al� including srrall building - $36,500 <br /> * Building Value <br /> 1�.arket - $3,700 <br /> i �tea .- �1,aoo � <br /> �?��'�.'�i?� CX�•�`�SSSIC�'� T��ETING - �,nril 18, 1977 <br /> �r. Hac}:ing ard A;r. Cargill presen`�ed a model indicating two possible dock locations <br /> �c�ss the marsh. One dock directed to the channel; the other fmm Lot 6 directly into <br /> e lake. Mr. Hacking said that the travel distance from Lot 1 to the second dock <br /> �ation kas cine-third of a mile objectionable. They requested approti�al of the plat <br /> as submitted wi�}-�o�t any consen-at�on e�se�,ent over the marsh area (Outlot B) . The <br /> �t'rlicant k-as znforned that the City reqt�ired an open space coRservation easement over <br /> �etlands and manhlands an a11 subdivisions, and felt that k�aiving this policy would <br /> Iy result in problerr� with this �nd other futu:�e subdi�rision proposals. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> i <br /> • <br /> ! <br /> • _ <br />