Laserfiche WebLink
� =;i`-,'_-_..'-_, . ,- .�`� I.�G O: _ .:� �������?:�O CG�;���CI�� -- -�i'H 2& 1977 <br /> • � Faae 5 <br /> _.�:.ry „�_ ; c`� � �=;��,i _; dir,c � �or;�-,g .�;.--��r.��strator VARIANCE <br /> , . , . , , � <br /> � r�ad into the record ��7inut_es of the Plar�ning 1030 Tonkawa Road <br /> Co:�:.-nission Neeting of March 7, 1977 , which state: n199 <br /> Mrs . Robert Gasch <br /> � 1-'rs . Gasch was present at the meeting. Once <br /> <_cain, sne reminded the Planning Corr�mission of <br /> � �_ne error that was made at the time Mrs. Parten' s <br /> house was constructed. Mrs. Parten is now living <br /> � in her home and is more aware-.of the problem. <br /> , Time has helped the situation and Mrs. Parten is <br /> ,�ow agreeable to the proposed fence, <br /> � ?�r s . Gasch a1 so infor,��ed the Com,-ni;sion that she <br /> � ���ould be planting evergrecns along the fence. <br /> ���r�en the day came that she coul d re,nove the <br /> � ience, she would do so. � <br /> � The Plar�ning Co���-nission reco�ended approval <br /> � of the proposed fence based on the current <br /> s�atus to try to alleviate some of the problerns <br /> � involved. Approval was subject to a written <br /> statement of approval from Mrs. Parten and <br /> � �he planting of evergreens to include the re;T�oval <br /> ! of this fence at some fut�re date. <br /> � <br /> Council 2��eeting - 2�larch 17, 1977 <br /> � Tabled on request of applicant. <br /> Council Neeting - Pia?-ch 28 , 1977 <br /> �% Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to approve the <br /> S variance request for r4rs. Gasch, 1030 Tonkawa <br /> Road, for a fence, subject to obtaining a letter <br /> � of no objection from rirs. Parten. Notion, <br /> Ayes (4) - r�ays (0) . <br /> � <br /> s` Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE <br /> • s�ated in his memo of March 16, 1977, that Mr. 9496 rdorth Shore Drive <br /> Allan Grannes , 4496 North Shore Dirve is request- �2ap <br /> � ing a lot area variance for an andition to his Al1an Grannes <br /> existing dwelling. The lot meets 80� of the lot <br /> � width requirement. The proposed addition would <br /> meet all setback requirements. <br /> � <br /> • The area of this lot is about 10, �00 sq, ft. <br /> short of the required 43, 560 sq. it. It does <br /> � not meet 800 of the required area and, therefore, " <br /> requires an area variance of about 10, 000 sq. ft. <br /> i ' <br /> He informs me the addition would not exceed the <br /> � heights of the existing structure. • <br /> � (Continued) <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />