My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-17-1977 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1977
>
03-17-1977 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2015 3:22:14 PM
Creation date
4/20/2015 3:22:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> - RESCHEDULED ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 17, 1977 Page 8 <br /> The question was raised: is there sufficient SUBDIVISION <br /> s water to allow navigation and what determines 500 Nort� Arm Drive <br /> ! where the lake is? (Continued) <br /> � Mayor Van Nest commented that elevation 929. 4 <br /> determines where the lake is. It appears that <br /> the question before us is not only the proper <br /> subdividing of land into buildable lots, but <br /> the dredging of new areas which does not relate <br /> = to maintenance of existing channels. <br /> ! Mayor Van Nest continued by stating that it <br /> appears by reviewing the proposed subdivision <br /> that there are other alternatives to what is <br /> being presented tonight and it would certainly <br /> be in the public interest to consider what is <br /> reasonable and has the least impact on the area. <br /> � Mr. Hacking, representing the applicant, commented � <br /> that he is not requesting action this evening and <br /> would want to review their proposal indepth when <br /> considering changing Outlots .B & C. <br /> Byrne Williar_is, Tom Williams, Dave Anderson, and <br /> R. P, 4Thite, residents from the area, stated <br /> � their opposition to the proposal. <br /> Mayor Van Nest then asked the applicants and <br /> �interested citizens for their input commenting <br /> that riparian rights in the proposed subdivision <br /> have been established. It would seem reasonable <br /> to request the applicant to review their proposal <br /> and: <br /> l. Check width of existing channel <br /> S 2. Consider easement wordage <br /> 3. Consider redrawing outlots <br /> 4. Review Outlot B as it relates to the channel <br /> 5. Differentiate between new dredging and <br /> maintenance requirements <br /> '� Mr. Hacking agreed to consider the Council' s <br /> concerns and requested to be entered on the <br /> March 28, 1977 Council agenda. <br /> � <br /> e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.