Laserfiche WebLink
�SC�EDULED ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD ?�IARCH 17, 1977 <br /> ��u Plarninp Cvtmissim .�,s �,}, Page 4 <br /> :rca ]�ck of applicant's c°"�lY�Y++1�th� pTDgrrss and put problaas resultinA <br /> i"a li`��„� p,.��,n:. SKI—TONI;A <br /> �r,� Plaminp CorRaissim a�t��,,,� c� cQ,aici <br /> ��y Ski Tonlc• }ud expircd, 7}�ry also felt the appliutlm ut w aiut�e �� (Continued) <br /> � �ot lived i,p to � ��d{ti� set forth (o„rtxr n���r s��itted safetr inspe�_ <br /> T cpo rt), <br /> �e applicant vu inscru�ted to subr�t �other curTmt applicatiDn with the <br /> necessary plaru and �u. Mo�er fce wuid be requirod with the nw appliutim, <br /> �?£fTING - Febnury 28� 1977 <br /> _" strUcted�pplic�nt su�t � ���o� Use applicatim xith proper siu plans, . <br /> -•S�uic.e certificite and qualified"rnpirrer's report. <br /> `sff nport to usure cc�liance with conforuwice to engineer's report. <br /> Ezt�nded licrnse for phax I, <br /> ��C �'Q�I� �7�+ - lharth 7, 1977 <br /> �Y Cmmission tabled this matter m the basis that a ��rnt �pplicatim has <br /> not been submitted, <br /> B��tler moved, Massengale seconded, to table the <br /> Sxi-Tonka, Phase II application until further <br />�formation is available. Motion, Ayes 4 <br />:S (0) . ( ) - <br />=�Butler moved, Massengale seconded, to direct the <br /> y Attorney to submit an amendment to the <br />��•isting ordinance to allow inspection of .ski <br />:�ws to be initiated and completed by the City, <br />��lying all costs to the applicants. This will <br />�e reviewed by the City Council at its March 28, <br /> ` '� Council meeting. Motion A <br /> . yes (4) - Nays �0) - <br /> � <br /> enry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, <br /> tdted that the Planning Commission noted that <br /> 1 ' hough the building for the Stubbs Ba STUBBS BAY MARINA <br /> 445 Bayside Road, does meet the required 75 . 3445 Bayside Road <br /> y Marina, �234 <br />� eshore setback, it exceeds the maximum 25$ - J�es McCleary - � <br /> 3rdcover in zone 2 (from 75' �0 250' from shore- <br />��) . They suggested reducin ' <br />� comply with the code. g the building size , <br /> «el he will submit a newPproposal meeting theet. <br />�r�icover requirements. � <br /> i <br /> , , <br />��applicant was also informed that the exposed, <br /> ecast metal surfaces of the structure would � ' <br /><_ ire some contrasting material to meet the - � � <br /> g � <br /> • Ii <br />�ldPlanning Comrlisslon determined a public hearing � ' <br /> be held regarding this pro osa ' <br /> i <br />�ordinance does not require itP 1 even though , � <br /> rected to notify all propert Staff was � <br /> ie subject propert y °Wriers within 300 ' <br />>n_g the shoreline ofyStubbsSBayny as possible <br /> • <br /> � <br /> (Continued) <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />