Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> S ORONO COUNCIL IuIEETING HELD JAUNARY 10, 1977 Pag� 32 <br /> Neither of these communities serves any residents M.W.C.C. SEWER CHARGES <br /> � of Orono any longer. Because of this and because (Continued) <br /> the City should a4just the sewer use charges to <br /> �sorb the PZ.W.C.C. increase, we feel that this <br /> � s an opportune time to adjust all customers to <br /> a tiniform charge. <br /> • " <br /> Van Nest moved, Massengale seconded, to use <br /> � the total $68,226.57 M.WeCeC. charges, the 1977 <br /> sewer operating budget of $61,500.00, and the <br /> , current delinquency rate of the utility billing <br /> � department as a basis for determining proposed <br /> increases for sewer operating charges. Motion, <br /> � Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> Dick Benson, City Ac'lministrator, informed the City MANDATORY LAND PLANNING <br /> � Council that the City of Orono has responded to ASSISTANCE ACT <br /> � the Metropolitan Council on the proposed PZandatory <br /> Land Planning Assistance Act with a revised <br /> � 3ystems Statement. tae have met with the Metropolitan <br /> Council and the T�etropoli�an Waste Control Commission <br /> � concerning Orono's Comprehensive Sewer Plano Orono <br /> will be meeting with Pdetro Council staff at a later <br /> • date. <br /> � <br /> � Dick ;?�nson, City Administrator, informed the City W.H.A.D. MEETING <br /> �uncil that the West Hennepin Assessing District <br /> � ...�11 ho].d a meeting January 12, 1977, at 7: 30 P.Ni. <br /> � in the City Council Chambers. <br /> � $ruce MalY.:.�;rson, City Attorney, informed the DNR - BEDER��TOOD PARK <br /> + City Council that the City is negotiating <br /> a Quick Claim Deed with the Department of <br /> � Natural Resources for the property next to <br /> Bederwood Park. <br /> • <br /> � Greg Frank, City Engineer, informed the City STUBBS BAY STUDY <br /> Council that we have received comments from the <br /> � Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and the <br /> ;�riinnE�;�'ta Pollution Control Agency concerning <br /> the feasibility of the Stubbs Bay sewer <br /> ,� alternatives suggested in our letter dated <br /> October 22, 1976. <br /> • <br /> ,The MPCA responded to our request for comments <br /> by telephonev DZre Gordon Wequart of the <br /> .Facilities Section said that the PCA had no <br /> preference except that a new treatment plant <br /> �would be unacceptable. The holding tank and <br /> �ucking alternative is probably not feasible <br /> cause the MPCA experience has been that it <br /> •is generally not cost effective. <br /> T•Zayor Van Nest requested Mr. Frank to continue <br /> iwith the Stubbs Bay Study directing attention <br /> +to correcting existing on-site disposal systems. <br />