Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � OROTdO COUNCIL MEETING HELD OCTOBER 25, 1976 Page 10 <br /> f' 6�elsh moved, T3utler seconded, that the VARIAr7CES <br /> �variance request for pon Roderick ancl Robert 2285 T�Jebber Hills Roa3 <br /> teelo 2285 T�Tehber Hills Road, be anproved (Continued) <br /> � per the Planning Commission Tlinutes of <br /> �)ctober 18, 1976. Motion, A.yes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> �s <br /> a Searles moved, Butler seconded, to reguest the PUBLyC H�ARING DATE <br /> � Planning Commission to hold a public hearing Navarre Rezoni�g <br /> �Jovember 150 1976 at 7e30 P,PZ. to consider <br /> � the Navarre ar_ea rezoning, Motion, Ayes (4) - <br /> Nays (0) , <br /> � <br /> � Henry _?uhich, Building & 2�oning Administrator, STATUS REPORTS <br /> informed the City Council that the following <br /> � items were being revie�aed by the Planning <br /> . Corimission for Council action at a later dates <br /> Ro�ert Johnson, 1121 Elmwood Avenue for a lot <br /> , area and width variance; Go Raymond & Ruth <br /> [-Volfe, 2925 Casco I?oin� Road for a side yard <br /> � variance; Ed Lehman, 3527 Shoreline Drive, for <br /> a prelirninary subdivision; Harvey Larson, 1342 <br /> • R�st Point Circle for a garage side yard and <br /> street setback variances; Steve ��Iallack (T.r4.G. ) , <br /> � 4100 Sixth Avenue rlorth for a l�reliminary sub- <br /> ` divisiona Bruce Peterson, 2447 Carman Street, <br /> -or a lot area, width setback variance; Robert <br /> � �olie, 1085 North Arm Drive, conditional use <br /> perrait; and Hennepin County Park Reserve <br /> » i�istrict Development Plans. <br /> • <br /> � Dick Benson, eity t'�dministrator, informed the NOIS� CONTROL <br /> Ci�1� Council that on October 6, 1976 ,he had two <br /> ` staff rnembers attend a workshop sponsored by the <br /> Pollution Control Agency Noise Control Section <br /> � far the purpose to familiarize us with different <br /> rec�ulations and devices concerning noise control. <br /> � An interesting fact is that through P,CeA, research, <br /> tires are the biggest no�se violator to date. <br /> r �Z'he initiai investment to purchase monitoring <br /> • equi�ment is $10000-$1,500, plus qualified <br /> personnel to staff the operationo It is obvious <br /> � that current minimal staff cannot take on a <br /> complete noise monitoring at this time. <br /> � <br /> �rhe P<C,A, did stat� that they might assist us <br /> • in a certain problem area. Mro Ed I�onteleone, <br /> Iiennepin County Environmentalist,� has been <br /> � requested to find out i� this service is available <br /> � at tYieir level of government, I have not received <br /> reply as yeto (Continued) <br /> s <br /> • <br /> � <br /> • <br />