Laserfiche WebLink
� ' ' ' <br /> � ORONO COUPdCIL MlEETING HELD 1�TARCH 22, 1976 Page 3 <br /> � The proposed location does meet a11 setback VARIANCES <br /> requirements. However, we c�o h�ve a pxoblem 1200 V�Iildhurst Trail <br /> �n the existing locat�on of �he residence (Continued) <br /> n the property to the south. t�le have here a <br /> � non-conforming situation which we should <br /> rectifyo At the tim� that the neighboring <br /> � residenc� wa� constructed, surveys were not <br /> � required with building permit applications. <br /> This house is now encroaching the property <br /> » line to such a degree that it does not even <br /> meet the minimum State requirements. I•Je <br /> � might suggest as an agreement between the <br /> �roperty owners, to change the lot lines <br /> � somewhat so we can resolve some of the problems. <br /> � tive could also consider slight variances on the <br /> side setback to the north, <br /> • <br /> We should try to meet the 20 ft, distances <br /> � between structures and also prevent future <br /> problems from any fences that might be erected <br /> • under another property owners windows> <br /> � Planning Commission Meeting - March 1, 1976 <br /> � Although not scheduled as part of the regular <br /> � meeting, the Commission reviewed the above <br /> a��plications. They then directed that I contact <br /> • ciro Kruskopf and state that the Planning <br /> �or.lmission would look favorably to a variance <br /> � if he by private negotiations try to realign <br /> � the lot line with his neighbor in order to <br /> alleviate the one foot setback problem. <br /> � Planning Commission rleeting - NTarch 15, 1976 <br /> � <br /> T�ir. Kruskopf and his neighbor, Gary t��Telsh, <br /> • apPeared and presented a map to show a <br /> � revised line that would give I1r. Welsh 10 ft. <br /> on the side yard in questiono However, Iir. <br /> ,� Kruskopf would have to alter his building <br /> plan by making a slight rotation of the house <br /> �, on the loto <br /> � The Commission recommended approval of the <br /> plan and the variances consisting of 50 ft. <br /> • on lot v�idth; 0, 3 of an acre on lot area <br /> � and a 6" variance on the side setback on the <br /> north lot line. <br /> � I3utler moved, I�Iassengale seconded, to approve <br /> � the variance for lot width and area and lot <br /> line rearrangement for David I:ruskopf, 1200 <br /> • Taildhurst Trail, as per the Planning Commissibn <br /> inutes ot PZarch 15, 1976. I�iotion, Ayes (2) - <br /> TJays (0) . Councilmember t�elsh abstaining. <br /> • <br /> � <br /> 0 <br />