Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> OROr10 COUTICIL n7EETING HELD P�IARCH 8, 1976 Page 6 <br /> � 7ienry i�iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISIODt <br /> �tated that Fred Lucas, 2055 Sixth Avenue 2055 Sixth Avenue Nor�th <br /> lorth, is requesting ap�roval of the preliminary <br /> su��division proposal of the 4.4 acre parcel <br /> (600) located on the southwest Ruadrant <br /> S af the intersection of County Road �'t6 and <br /> �3rou�n Road. <br /> This area is zoned RR-1B - (2 acre minimur.l <br /> area) e Both proposed parcels (A & B) would <br /> exceed the minimum requirements of 87,120 sq. <br /> f�o area and 200 ft. minimum lot width. <br /> (Parcel A - 129,000 sq. fto plus and 247 ft. <br /> wideo Parcel B - 126,000 sq. ft. plus and <br /> 270 ft, wide) <br /> The Planning Cor.unission has scheduled a <br /> public hearing on the proposal for 7a30 P.PT. , <br /> iionday, r�larch 1, 1976. <br /> S <br /> Planning Commission PaTeeting - P•larch 1, 1976 <br /> � <br /> Tlie Commission recommended approval of the <br /> preliminary subdivision application of £'red <br /> � Lucas, as submitted, and subject to the <br /> Par}: Dedication Fee. <br /> �earles rnoved, Paurus seconded, to approve <br /> the preliminary subdivision for I'red Lucas, <br /> 2055 Sixl-.h Avenue rlorth, as per the Planning <br /> Corrunission r.linutes of zlarch 1, 1976. flotion, <br /> Ay�s (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> �ienry I•Tuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, STREET VACATION <br /> � stated that Mr, & P-Zrs, Esco, 300 Crestvie�� Hill Street <br /> Avenue, are submitting a request to vacate <br /> a �ortion of Hill Street as his existing <br /> well, side entry enclosure and garage are <br /> located on the right-of-waya <br /> A similar proposal tvas denied by the Planning <br /> i Commission and Council on February 12 , 1973. <br /> 6de informed the applicant's counsel of this <br /> but he requested we proceed with the proposal <br /> as submitted, <br /> The existing garage is in need of repair and <br /> probably could be removed or moved, The entry <br /> enclosure could be removed and the well <br /> could be moved. <br /> I would recomrnend against this vacation as <br /> it �aoul� result in landlocking the property <br /> to the easto <br /> A public hearing should be scheduled. (Continuecl? <br />