Laserfiche WebLink
� , <br /> � OROiJO COUNCIL T�ZEETING. HELD.�.PRIL 26, 1976 Page 2 <br /> � ����elsh moved, Paur�s sec�rided; that the request RIP RAP PEFtA1IT <br /> of Phillip Dykstra, �O�b North Shore Drive, for 3080 North Shore Drive <br /> � rip rap nermito be re�erred to the Planninq <br /> � Coriunission, Tlotion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) , <br /> • <br /> lJelsh moved, Pauru5 seconded, that the request CONDITIONAL USE PE�2i��IT & <br /> � of James Abbot�i 1000 I3rown Road South, for a VARIANCE <br /> conditional us� pe�mit and variarfce, be referred 1000 Brown Road South <br /> • to the Planninc� Commissiono t2otion, Ayes (4) - <br /> . ilays (0) , <br /> � '�aelsh moved, Paurus seconded, that the request COPIDITIOi�IAL USE PER��IIT & <br /> � of Tonl Vickerman, 679 i�innetonka Highlands Lane, VARIANCE <br /> for a conditional use permit �nd variance, be 679 P�innetonka Highlands <br /> • referred to the Planning Commis�ion. P4otion, Lane <br /> Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> � i1Tr, Ronald D, Ross o 1960 LalCeview Terrace CONDITIONAL USE PERl'�'iIT <br /> �tated thato 1960 Lakeview Terrace <br /> � "I have considered your proposal and I have <br /> � decided against signing off an easemento <br /> r lo The barn is 1a����d on Lot 1, the proposed <br /> � easement is for Lot 2. I cannot see any relevance <br /> �ettaeen the two topics. <br /> � 2o Signing of� an easement for Lot 2 would not <br /> � put me in compliance with any Orono ordinance <br /> that I am now breaking, <br /> � <br /> 3o Lot 2 is considered by Orono as wetlands <br /> � and unbuildable. The apparent reason iahy I <br /> a�n being asked to sign this easement is to <br /> � assure Orono that no building can ever be <br /> + i�laced on that loto But since the Village has <br /> the power to grant or deny building permits <br /> � any��ay, this easement proposal appears redunclant <br /> and unnecessary to the Village. <br /> • <br /> � o There is no apparent advantage to me in <br /> � doing so, The reason I initially considered <br /> � the proposal is that I had heard that sometimes <br /> Village or County or State authorities allow <br /> � d�velo�ment or even develop themselves wetlands <br /> i�roperty to make it more suitable for certain <br /> � types of wildlife (like a duck pond or etc, ) if <br /> that property is sold to or given to ther:l or <br /> � i�� an easeinent is granted, This proposal has no <br /> � such implicationso <br /> ��nce all these things have virtually nothing to <br /> do with my request for a conditional use permit, <br /> � �: respectfully request consideration of my permit <br /> based on its own merit and on its own compliance. " <br /> • <br /> • <br />