Laserfiche WebLink
s � ' <br /> MINUTES OF A SPECIAL Nl�ETING HELD DECE1�iSER 10, 1975 - PAGE 4 <br /> 3. There may be irreparable damage to the wetlands and RESOLUTION M0. 653 <br /> marshes of Orono unless there is first an additional study cont. <br />� of t'�e possible adverse effects of the interceptor. <br /> 4. The interceptor as understood presently by the City <br /> is contrary to the land use policies of the City. <br /> 5. The City must be granted a sixty day extension of time <br />• to allow for a detailed analysis of the i.nterceptor, which <br /> analysis addresses itself to the concerns raised herein and <br /> � set forth in the letters of December 4 and November 26, 1975, <br /> attached hereto. <br /> E. The City still approv�es of the concept of removing ef- <br /> s fluent from Lake D4innetonka but must have additional tirrue to <br /> rVview the final plans and specifications once they are filed <br />� and the proposed amendments to the environment assess�nt to <br /> c_�termine if the interceptor is environmentally acceptable <br /> � to the City. <br /> � 7. The City of Orono appreciates the recent staff assis- <br /> tance provided by the M6�ICC and the PCA and hopes that through <br /> � ?*rm�d.iate review and reaction by their staffs and the City <br /> s:;aff and City Council that the questions which have been <br /> a raised concerning this project may be answered satisfactorily <br /> and thvt the project or a project similar in nature may be <br /> � implernented in the calendar year of 1976. <br /> 8. If there is any possibility of applying for federal <br /> fi��:ds and holding those funds for the interceptor for at <br />� l:;asl ninety days until additional analysis and input can <br /> be ccr.ipleted by the City, that the PCA take those steps <br /> necessary to realize those goals. <br /> 9. '.�e City asks that the PCA or other agencies charged <br /> with the responsibility of abating and preventing pollution <br /> �+� ��_e Lake A�innetonka area take those steps necessary to <br /> � ot�taan fimds to finance a co�mplete study to be �.de by the <br /> T��I�nnehaha Creek tivatershed District concerning the effect of <br /> L_rbanization on Lake Minnetonka and the surroundi.ng water- <br />� sl�ed. �,lotion, Ayes (S) - Nays (0) . <br /> s <br /> Searles moved, Paurus seconded, that the following cover LETTER TO METI�?POLITAN <br /> • �e�ter to the Metropolitan Waste Control Corranission regarding WASTE CONTROL C�'IISSION <br /> the Orono-Long Lake Interceptor, as drafted by the City At- -CITY C�1TS ON Tf-iE <br /> '� torn�y, be approved and submitted. Motion, Ayes (5) Nays (0) . PUBLIC HEARING - ORONO- <br /> LONG LAKE INTER(�PTOR <br /> To Mr. Stephen Allbee, Planning Coordinator; A4etropolitan <br /> � Was-�e Control Commission; Seventh and Robert Street; St. Pau1, <br /> n�i_iszn�sota, 55101. <br /> • <br /> It is my understanding pursuant ta our telephone conversation <br /> of today, that the City of Orono will be able to submit com- <br /> ma���s to be entered into the record �or your review as late <br /> as �ecember 11, 1975. Enclosed please find: <br /> � (1) A Resolution rec�uesting a sixty day extension from the <br /> Pe?lution Control Agency to allow the City of Orano an oppor- <br /> � tt�.ity for a detailed analysis of the proposed Orono-Long Lake <br /> In'cerceptor; <br /> S (2) A copy of our letters of December 4 and Noverr�er 26, <br /> � 1975, to the A�C concerning this matter; <br /> (3) A copy of the amendments which the representative of <br /> � BioCentrics and the representatives of the City of Orono re- <br /> vie�aed, which amendments should be incorporated where applicable <br />