Laserfiche WebLink
• � f <br />� P�IIMITES OF A SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1975 - PAGE 3 <br /> Van Nest felt that there wauld be few construction problems OROI�-LONG LAKE <br /> • with Alternate No. 6. Butler asked Mr. Hickok, as to the case INTERCEPTOR, cont <br /> . of the seal in the manhes being broken, whether this could <br /> create a gain in water in other areas - possibly flooding of <br /> residential properties. Hickok replied it could happene Gloria <br /> M�Donald �1�� wanted to lrnow if the marsh could be entirely <br /> � lost if the seal were broken. Hickok replied, "Yes, it could <br /> happen". Massengale asked, "Are these valid concerns?" Hickok <br />� replied "Yes, especially with 3 1/2 miles of ���'��`:' Searles <br /> noted that the pipe would be set very deep and could walk around <br /> S on the marsh and break. bla.ssengale expressed his feelings that <br /> our marshes would always be imder threat with ma.intenance pro- <br />� blems, Van Nest noted that the cost of the initial installation <br /> � of Alternate 1 was 1/3 more than the pressure system but was <br /> justified because it wwld cost a million and a half less for <br /> � Orono to hook up trwzks and laterals but felt this was bad logic <br /> because we don't want to hook-in as it is not consistent with <br />• our Compre hensive Plan. It was also pointed out that our <br /> north rural area was considered by Metro policies as an urban- <br /> � ized area and it was felt that from an environmental standpoint <br /> it would have a bad effect an the Lake. Hickok related that <br /> h�avy residential areas create storm water in which pollutants <br /> � could not be controlled. The City Administrator presented a <br /> R�solutian that had been drafted because of the immediate need <br />• to respond on the project. Ma.yor Searles read the Resolution <br /> a.n no one voiced objections or disagreement with it's content. <br /> n"assengale moved, Butler seconded, that the Cotmcil adopt RESOLUTION N0. 653 <br />� Resolution No. 653 entitled, "Resolution Rec{uesting Sixty ORONO-LONG LAKE <br /> D�y Extension From the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) To INi'ERCEPTOR - REQUEST <br /> � Al1ow the City of Or�o an Opportunity for a Detailed Ana.- TO POLLUTION CANTROL <br /> �ysis of the Proposed Orono-Long Lake Interceptor" and having A(�1CY FOR TII�� EX- <br /> the following content: TENSION <br /> � tVhereas, the City of Orono first received the environmental <br /> , assessment concerning the proposed Orono-Long Lake interceptor <br /> (hereinafter interceptor) on November 14, 1975, and <br />� t'dhereas, the City of Orono ha.s not had adec{ua.te time to <br /> review the em�ronmental assess�nt prior to the December 4, <br />• 1975 public hearing on the proposed interceptor, and <br /> Whereas, the City of Orono still has not received the final <br />� plans and specifications for the interceptor, and <br /> � �ahereas, the City of Orono is very concerned about the pos- <br /> sible adverse environmental effects of the proposed interceptor; <br />� Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved: <br /> 1. The City Coi,mcil, Planning Comanission and staff ha.ve not <br /> S had adequa.te time ta review the environmental assessment sub- <br /> mitted concerning the interceptor and have not yet seen the final <br /> • plans and specifications for proposal Number 1 of the interceptor. <br />• 2. There has been no application by the P•9WCC or any other <br /> agency for a variance Lmder our Ordinance No. 125, to allow for <br /> � the construction of the interceptor within 26 feet of or within <br /> the wetlands and marshes in the City of Orono. Such an appli- <br />� cation from the Metropolitan �Vaste Control Com�iissioai (herein- <br /> after Mt�C) mur� be made, reviewed and approved prior to any <br />• construction. <br />