Laserfiche WebLink
� • . <br /> � OROI10 COUI�ICIL iJIEETING HELD NOVEi�iBER 24, 1975 Page 3 <br /> � He noted that there was still no commitment C1�EXENNE LAND COr1PANY <br /> � from the P�letropolitan Waste Control Commission (Continued) <br /> that the sewer interceptor would be built in <br /> this area and even if such an interceptor <br /> were built, the purpose of that interceptor <br /> � was to remove the effluent from two sewage <br /> treatment plants and not to provide for sewer <br /> r for municipal development in the areaa He <br /> stated that other property owners have developed <br /> � their property as two acre sites and that to <br /> • change the zoning of this property to one acre <br /> would result in the diminuation of land value <br /> � and would adversely affect those people who <br /> have followed the two acre zoning. �ie noted <br /> � that based upon his review of the site and <br /> based upon his and other staff reports that he <br /> � recommends that the Council adopt a resolution <br /> + that was recommended by the Planning Commission <br /> to deny the request for rezoning. <br /> � i•iayor Searles asked if there was anyone present <br /> A representing Cheyenne who would like to make a <br /> commento Jim Diracles, attorney for Cheyenne, <br /> � noted that he would be glad to entertain any <br /> questions concerning the property, He agreed <br /> �' that there were traffic problems on Orono Orchard <br /> Road and that there was a need to eliminate thoseo <br /> He stated that if there were any questions he <br /> would be glad to respond. Councilmember <br /> i�iassengale noted that the proposed subdivision <br /> � that was submitted was conceptual in nature <br /> only and that it was submitted just to assist <br /> � the Planning Commission and Council to review <br /> ` the advisaUility of granting rezoning to the <br /> property. P�Iayor Searles noted that there has <br /> � been considerable review concerning this matter <br /> by the Planning Commission and by the staffo <br /> � Councilmember Paurus stated that he thought <br /> the Planning Commission was not satisified <br /> � concerning the various wetland maps submitted <br /> by the applicant showing the location of the <br /> � marsheso Planning Commission member Guthrie, <br /> who was in the audience, stated that several <br /> A different versions of the wetlands had been <br /> � submitted to the Planning Commission and there <br /> still has not been a final determination of <br /> r the extent of the wetlands on this property. <br /> Brad Van Nest of the Planning Commission, noted <br /> � that the Planning Commission had doubts that <br /> • the wetlands as shown on the maps as supplied <br /> by the applicant included all the wetlands on <br /> � the property. �layor Searles again asked if <br /> �there were any comments by representatives of <br /> Cheyenne and there were noneo <br /> � <br /> � (Continued) <br /> � <br />