Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL NOVEMBER 17, 1975 Page 6 <br /> � <br /> � - 12. Status of County Rds. 6 and 19 realignment. PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> FAVOR COMMENTS (Continued) <br /> 13. Need for a better connection between Mound and <br /> T. H. 7. YES. <br /> � Although the projection of Table #1 for the year <br /> ! 2000 is below our present zoning saturation level, <br /> the rate of growth is accelerated beyond our pro- <br /> ,� jections and we are projecting our saturation <br /> approximately to the year 2035, or 60 years from <br /> � now. We would recommend that the population figures <br /> be adjusted down on the chart from 12,9000 to our <br /> � 2o growth rate: <br /> � 1980 1990 2000 <br /> ! 8 ,179 g , 775 11,916 <br /> � On Table #2, we do not have 3,500 jobs. The rate <br /> is out of line. <br /> � <br /> The Table #4 household forecast should read as <br /> � follows: <br /> � 1980 1990 2000 <br /> � 2 , 673 3,194 3, 894 <br /> cting Mayor Massengale restated Orono' s position <br /> which is: <br /> � Hennepin County Roads #19, #k10, and #15 east of Mound as <br /> + collectors. County Roads #92 , #15 west of Mound, <br /> #110 as arterials, which would connect #110 and #19 <br /> � north of Mound to High�ways #6 and #12, alleviating <br /> traffic near the lake�creating County #15 as an <br /> � eventual scenic parkway. <br /> � Mr. Massengale also commented that Hennepin County' s <br /> proposal does not agree with Orono's Comprehensive <br /> i Guide Plan and Land Use Plan, which was adopted by <br /> • the Metro Council. <br /> � Acting Mayor Massengale requested the Planning <br /> Commission to review and recommend action for <br /> � Council approval at their November 24, 1975 meeting. <br /> � Councilmernber Paurus left at 8: 20 P.M. <br /> � Acting Mayor Walter Massengale announced that a PUBLIC HEARING <br /> � public hearing was to be held by the Metro Waste December 4, 1975 <br /> Control Commission on December 4 , 1975, 3:00 P.M. 3: 00 P.M. <br /> � at the Freshwater Biological Institute to review <br /> �he Orono-Long Lake interceptor. Discussion <br /> ontinued with the compatibility with Orono's <br /> Comprehensive Land Use Plan and concern was <br /> • expressed with creating further urban development <br /> and a greater pollution factor to Lake Minnetonka. <br /> � <br /> � <br />