Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � � MINUTES OF A COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 4 , 1974 Page 19 <br /> � <br /> It was noted that these are narrow winding roads <br /> �v,�hich are very dangerous at the present time. <br /> � Moreover, the bridges that are servicing this area <br /> would be inadequate for additional vehicular loads . <br /> � <br /> The members present also noted that to allow HARDCOVER <br /> � intense developments in this area would force RESTRICTIONS <br /> the village to sewer this entire area. The laying <br /> r of sewer pipe in the area would be destructive <br /> • to the environment and would result in erosion <br /> problems which would cause pollution to Lake <br /> ! Minnetonka. Moreover, the cost of sewering this <br /> entire area would be prohibitive. If this area had <br /> � to be sewered, then this area would be forced into <br /> even more dense development in order to support <br /> • the cost of sewering an area such as this with so <br /> many topographical and ecological problems . Dense <br /> � development would then lead to increased storm <br /> � water run-off and result in pollution of Lake <br /> D�innetonka. <br /> � The members present noted that the proposed amend- <br /> � ments would prohibit any excavating, filling, hard <br /> cover, temporary or permanent structures within 75 <br /> • feet of the shoreline. Within 75 to 250 feet of <br /> the shoreline, there would be no greater than 25% <br /> � hard cover. Within 250 to 500 feet of the shore- <br /> • line there would be no greater than 30% hard cover <br /> allowed. Within 500 to 1000 feet of the shoreline <br /> � there would be no greater than 35% hard cover <br /> allowed. <br /> • <br /> The members present felt that these restrictions <br /> � were necessary in order to prevent the rapid storm <br /> water run-off which is presently occurring in the <br /> • developed areas along the lakeshore. <br /> � It was noted that the Surface Water Management <br /> � Plan, the Harza studies, and the various guide- <br /> lines by the watershed districts and the Lake <br /> � Minnetonka Conservation District also supported <br /> these regulations . <br /> � <br /> Moreover, it was noted that D N R had previously <br /> • promulgated guidlines for unincorporated areas <br /> . which supported these type of designations. <br /> � Van Nest then shifted the discussion to the area AREA E-2 <br /> marked as E-2. The area known as E-2 is presently B-1 to RR-1B <br /> � �-1 Commercial and will be rezoned to RR-1B, 2 <br /> acres. It was noted that within the E-2 area, <br /> � <br /> r <br /> � <br />