Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> . MINUTES OF A COUNCIL NIE�TING HII�D DEC.E�'1BER 4, 1974 Page 10 <br /> � in the marshes and Lake NLinnetonka. It was noted <br /> that the zoning must provide a large enough lot size <br /> area to allaw the property awners to continue with the <br /> uses which are presently enjoyed in the area. STORM WATER <br /> This amendm�nt looks to the present future needs of the RUN-OFF ' <br /> • village in that it will elminate the continuation of pol- <br /> lution to the water system and will allow the continuation <br /> � of life styles in that area. The Surface Water Management <br /> Plan and the Harza Reports of January, 1971 indicate that <br /> � such a rezoning is necessazy. These reports also indicate <br /> that the single largest source of pullutents to the water <br /> � shed and to the lakes is frcgn the nutrient load contained <br /> in the sewage treai�rn.nt plants. The second largest source <br /> � of pollutents is the storm water run-off. If these areas <br /> . and other areas of the city were allawed to be densely de- <br /> veloped, then the entire area would have to be sewered and <br /> � in addition would have to be supplied with adequate storm <br /> sewer facilities to drain all of the storm water run-off <br /> , into a treatrnQ_nt plant for chemical treatznent to remr�ve <br /> at least 900 of the nutrients, prior to discharge into the <br /> � 1_akes. Such a program would bankrupt the village and force <br /> an increase in taxes which would force all the wealthiest <br /> � peop�.e to move from the village. It was noted in these <br /> . reports the only effective and practical means of purifi- <br /> cation ofstorm water run-off is through the natural marshes <br /> � and open lands presently located in area B and in those <br /> areas along the lakeshore. It was clear fran prior meet- <br /> � ings and reports which have been presented to the village that <br /> � the increased urbanization in this area would result in <br /> poorer storm water run-off and would result in the destruction <br /> of Lake NLinnetonka. Searles noted that Lake Minnetonka has <br /> � no adequate source of water except for the storm water run- <br /> • off. The village cannot allaw developmexlt as 1 acre lots <br /> which would destroy the lake. The village can recogriize <br /> � that its previous land use policies have been inadquate and <br /> must work to solve the pollution problems created by dense <br /> � development in this area by rezoning these areas frcen 1 to 2 <br /> acres. M�oreover, to allaa the area to be developed as 1 <br /> � acre would force the extension of public sewer to the area <br /> and force the village to develop major storm water treatment <br /> r plants, the cost of which �uld be astronanical. Searles <br /> • noted that Lake Minnetonka requires 25 years in order to turn <br /> over the water in the system. The lake must rely upon the <br /> � stonn water runroff and if that-s��ntwater run-off is not <br /> pure, then the lake will never be able to survive. Unlike <br /> � other lakes, there is no opportunity for natural flush-out <br /> of pollutents once they are in the Lake. He noted that the <br /> � studies by the City of Minneapolis concerning Lake Calhoun <br /> • indicate that storm water run-off is the major source of <br /> pollution to the lake. Searles <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />� <br /> � <br /> � <br />