My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
09-12-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2019 1:34:55 PM
Creation date
4/4/2017 3:54:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
812
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July18, 2016 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, noted it would be difficult to fit a sidewalk in that area since the developer is <br />proposing to build a berm and a fence for privacy. Gronberg stated a sidewalk could go in along the <br />right-of-way on County Road 19. <br />Barnhart stated the Council has discussed a similar situation on other recent developments and that they <br />have required an easement but have allowed the easement to be landscaped. Barnhart noted any trail <br />would impact the buffering and berm proposed by the developer. <br />Lemke asked whether the Planning Commission feels it is imperative that 10 percent private open space <br />be provided by the developer. <br />Barnhart stated the developer could pay a park dedication fee instead of a land donation. Barnhart noted <br />the only public space nearby is Lydiard Beach and that there would not be a connection from this property <br />to that area. Barnhart stated if the Planning Commission does not feel the need for the land donation, they <br />would basically be waiving that. <br />Lemke asked whether there are any other issues or concerns with the application. <br />Leskinen commented she is still on the fence a little bit but that she is closer to approving it versus some <br />of the other proposals the City has seen for this property. Leskinen stated she does have a concern with <br />removal of so many trees on the site, but that given the work that would be needed on the site, it may be <br />difficult to preserve very many. <br />McGrann stated he is inclined to have the application move forward with the hope that the developer will <br />send out the plans to the neighbors prior to the City Council meeting. <br />Olson commented the proposal is a good use of the site and that the developer is willing to work with the <br />neighbors on the landscaping. <br />Lemke indicated he is in agreement with the conditions recommended by Staff.. <br />Page 15 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.