My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-19-1974 Council Work Session Minutes with Planning Commission
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1974-2024 Minutes - work sessions
>
1974
>
12-19-1974 Council Work Session Minutes with Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2015 1:15:07 PM
Creation date
4/15/2015 1:15:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� - � <br /> Council and Planning Cor�mission �Voak Session, Dec. 19, 1974 -5 <br /> The Council then discussed the proposed B-3 shopping center B-3 <br /> business districts regulations and found that there was no <br /> need to change any of the language thereof. <br /> 'I�ie Council then discussed the proposed B-4 office and B-4 <br /> � nrofessional district regulations and found no need to change <br /> � any of the language at this point. <br /> '�Ze Council then discussed secti.on 7 of the Proposed amend- Industrial District <br /> ment. The Cour�c-i_l fOL171�1 tha.t there was no c�isagreement as <br /> to the lan�nzage that had been previously presented. <br /> +� T�ie Council tlien discussed section � of the proposed amend- ParkinQ : Signs <br /> ment �,rhich dealt with exterior storage in R districts. <br /> `�1e Council then discussed section 9 of. the proposed <br /> amendment which dealt with the size and height of signs <br /> in all �usiness districts and the location of parking <br /> s Lises in business districts, i10 chanaes tivere su�gested. <br /> Tlie Council then discussed section 10 of the proposed RenPaled Sections <br /> amendment �tiihich repealed Chapter 29 of the �tunicipal <br /> � �ode. It was felt that suc7� a repeal was necessary in <br /> t'iat Chapter 29 was always outside the zoning code <br /> anc3 �vas antic�uated, n�toreover, the uses that t.aere pre- <br /> viously allowed by special permit in Ciiapter 29, in many <br /> �cases were not allowed by otller provisions of tlie code. <br /> 7"'iose uses that were allrnved in �iapter 29_l��T sp�cial <br /> ��sP perr;iit and iv�lich ivere acceptable to the f;ener�l land <br /> trse concepts of Orono had been previously incorporated as <br /> conditional uses in tlie various use districts. Sections <br /> � 3�.830 - 38,83� of the �runicipal Code were considered and <br /> t?.e concensus was that they should be repealed since they <br /> ,:iealt t.vit',i multiple di��ellinr�s such as apartment buildings. <br /> It was noted that multiple dwellings presently were <br /> • allocaed only as planned resic�ential developments. It was <br /> roted that in the future when Orono has adec{uate sewer lines <br /> to service areas which have adeauate transportation fac- <br /> ilities, tne Council would consider amending the Zoning <br /> �ode to allow for apar _�� developments. It cvas noteci <br /> � t'�1t the comprehensive plan indicated that such an <br /> ��er.;iment in the ft-ture would be necessary. <br /> � <br /> '�''ie �ouncil then di��:ussed the proposed amendment to r•9ARIN.A LICF�i1SE ORL�I:�1111`dCE <br /> Cliapter 73 whicli deals with marina licensing. The City <br /> :lttorney recorrn�ended certain changes in the wording of <br /> the provisions in order to clarif_y ambiguities and to <br /> insure compatibility of these provisions tiJith otlier <br /> sections of the ;�tunicipal Code. That wording was reviewed <br /> by tlie �ouncil and they found no objections to it. It <br /> �aas noted that the wordinb made no substantive changes <br /> from the draft that tvas previously presented at the <br /> 'ublic IIearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.