Laserfiche WebLink
Council and Planning CoTranission Work Session, Dec. 19, 1974 -4 <br /> operations generate an intolerable amount of traffic on the <br /> , roads that are already inadequate to service the areas. <br /> '�Toreover, most of the B-2 areas ha.ve no public sanitary <br /> � sewer system to which the operations can hook up and it <br /> was a well docwnented fact that restaurants must have nublic <br /> � sanitary sewer hook ups in order to insure that the ground <br /> water supplies and the lake would not be polluted by the <br /> '� materials which are discharged by such a restaurant use. <br /> "toreover, it was noted that any restaurant use along the <br /> � lake results in increased hard cover and storr;► water run- <br /> � off prouleMs and the resulting pollution t}ierefror� into <br /> Lake Minnetonka. Also this basic residential la};e shore <br /> � land was set aside for only needed marina uses and should <br /> • not be diverted to other uses that are allowed in other <br /> use districts within the city. <br /> a 'I'he discussion then shifted to the general <br /> requirements of parking, outside storage and landscaping <br /> � areas. It was felt that additional restrictions were <br /> needed on outside storage as to the height of structures <br /> � allowed for such stora�e. All of the members present <br /> felt that the provisions of the proposed draft in all <br /> other respects were necessary in order to protect the <br /> lake from over-use, to protect the nearby residential <br /> uses from the blighting influence of the marina opera- <br /> �tions, and to insure the health, safety and welfare of <br /> t'�e citizens of Orono. <br /> Thereafter, the Council reviewed each section of the REVIEW OF PROPOSED <br /> proposed amendment to the Zoning Code. The Council AA'�i��,�]T <br /> found no need to cha.nge any of the wording of section 1 <br /> � and the Council discussed the alternatives of changing <br /> the non-conforming use language in section 2 from 500 <br /> to 750. The Council found no need to change any of the <br /> � �aording of the proposed section 4, The Council then dis- Residential Districts <br /> cussed section 5 of the proposed amendment and indicated <br /> that certain changes should be r�ade to the "purpose sections" <br /> of each residential district. <br /> The Council then discussed the proposed section 6 of the Business Districts <br /> M zoning amendment. It was noted by Councilmember Paurus <br /> that "pet stores" should be included as a permitted B=1 <br /> � retail and service business. OtherGvise, there were no <br /> changes proposed for the B-1 use district. The Council <br /> then discussed the B-2 lakeshore business district and B-2 <br /> concluded that the draft as proposed was acceptable in <br /> all respects. The City Attorney recommended changing <br /> some language in the B-2 section in order to insure <br /> the compatability of that language with other sections <br /> � of the Municipal Code. The proposed lanr�uage was dis- <br /> cussed '�y the memt,�ers present. <br />