Resolution 1594 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, , �� . Cit� of ORONO � • � � . RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � . NO. 1594 • . . • - • • , Section 35. �146 minimum building setbacksi front 35 ft; rear 35 ft; side 15 ft. . . Section 35. 050 maximum building height: 30 feet or 2 1/2 stories. Section 38.311 minimum on-site parking for office buildings is 1 � space per 200 sq ft of floor area. - Section 38.315 minimum on-site parking for retail sales is 1 � space per 1501 sq ft of net floor area. � 3. The property now contains a real estate sales office of approximately 1500 sq feet of floor area together with � approximately 5 on-site vehicle parking spaces. Retail sales and real estate sales are permitted uses in the B-1 District. Other professional office userequiresa conditional use permit. � 4. The property is approximately 75 feet wide and approximately 780J0 sq feet in area. Parcel A is approximately 8500 sq feet in area. Any redevelopment of the property with or without Parcel A . requires approval of lot area and lot width variances to zoning : • ordinance � Sections 35. �41 and 35. 042 respectively, which variances are necessary to preserve the owners substantial � property right to continuation of an on-going permitted use . 5. Maximum development of the property and Parcel A combined in full� . conformance with all B-1 District performance standards would be limited by a balance between building setbacks, building envelope and accomodating the required number of on-site vehicle parking spaces. Such maximum development would be a two-story office buiTdirig totaling approximately 489J�J gross square feet together with the 24 on-site parking spaces required for this amount of office use. Such office use would also require . : approval of a conditional use permit. Any retail use would � require additional on-site parking thereby reducing the maximum size of the building in order to accomodate same. • ' 6. Utilization of City-owned Parcel A for vehicle parking to serve the property would require approval of a variance to Section 38. 311 to omit on-site parking , but would result in the same practicaleffectasthemaximum developmentplan outlined in item . #5 above; would be in keeping with the purpose of providing the , • City parking lot; and would not be adverse to the public° health , . safety or welfare in that this number of off-street parking spaces can be fully met by the City parking lot. :.` • 7. Placement of a building on the property in the same physical location as in the maximum development plan outlined in item #5 above would result in a five (5) foot setback from the rear •