My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4257
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4200 - 4299 (November 23, 1998 - May 24, 1999)
>
Resolution 4257
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2017 3:08:34 PM
Creation date
3/2/2017 3:08:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, � ! <br /> � O� � <br /> O O <br /> , C ITY of ORONO <br /> � ti <br /> '� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L9kE H�4��'G - NO. __4 2�; 7 : <br /> S <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this amendment on March 15, 1999 <br /> and recommended approval of the proposed amendment based upon the <br /> following unique findings and hardships: <br /> A. The proposed roof line change would raise the roof line. <br /> B. The concrete front stoop is located over a basement. <br /> C. The subject properry does not cunently meet the lot area requirements. <br /> � D. The revised plan would not increase hardcover or structural coverage on <br /> the lot. <br /> E. The approved site plan would not be altered by the changes proposed by <br /> the applicant. . <br /> F. The change to the roof design is to alleviate future problems with ice <br /> dams. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or dif�'iculty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> � recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety <br /> and welfare of the community. . <br /> 6. The plan meets the intent of the approvals granted in 1997, per Resolution No. <br /> 3 891. <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.