Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 9, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(15. #07-3274 BRUCE PADDOCK, 1450 AND 1500 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the Planning Commission recommended denial of a ‘before the fact’ hardcover allotment <br />variance for Lot 2, concluding that such variance should be applied for in due course at the time a real <br />proposal for replacement of the home is presented. The applicant has provided an analysis of the <br />hardcover status of Lot 2, suggesting that a 17,500 square feet allotment would be reasonable rather than <br />the 75-250 foot zone 25 percent limit of 14,061 square feet. The applicant has indicated that the shape <br />of the lot as a point with much area being within the 0-75 foot zone is a hardship, as well as the need to <br />provide for a home commensurate with the surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />Stickney indicated they have spoken with the fire marshal regarding the width of the right-of-way and <br />that they are willing to construct a 40-foot roadway for a certain portion of the development and then <br />near the entrance to the Headrick property the road would be reduced to 16 feet and then widened <br />slightly to 20 feet after it reaches the Shaughnessy property. Stickney stated the proposed road is an <br />improvement over what currently exists and provides a better view of the lake. Stickney noted they are <br />also proposing to reduce the overall hardcover on the lots. <br /> <br />Murphy stated there are bigger issues that need to be settled than the hardcover issue and that it would <br />be inappropriate for the City Council to be approving hardcover variances without seeing a plan. <br /> <br />Murphy commented he would like the City and the property owners to preserve Bracketts Point as much <br />as possible. <br /> <br />White stated he is reluctant to reduce the road width from what the fire marshal has recommended. <br /> <br />McMillan inquired how much digging and trenching would be required in order to relocate the utilities. <br /> <br />Stickney indicated there would be some trenching and power cabling. Stickney noted the narrower <br />roadway would only be serving two private residences and that Mark Gronberg has spoken with the fire <br />marshal and that what they are proposing is acceptable to him. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated he did speak with the fire marshal and showed him the proposed plans. The fire <br />marshal indicated that given the size of the houses, in the event of a fire in this area, it would be likely <br />that multiple fire departments would be called to respond. Staff is not comfortable recommending a <br />road width less than 20 feet. <br /> <br />Murphy stated Mr. Stickney makes a good point about the width of the road but that he is unfamiliar <br />with the tree situation in this area. Murphy suggested that the survey delineate the location of the trees <br />and topography in the area. <br /> <br />White noted the trees may die due to the utility relocation. <br /> <br />City Engineer Kellogg stated the proposed sanitary sewer profile shows that the sewer would be 20 feet <br />deep and that it is unlikely the trees would survive. <br /> <br />White recommended the residences also include a fire suppression system of some type. <br /> <br />Murphy stated the road width issue needs to be dealt with but that the City has allowed narrower roads <br />than what the fire marshal has recommended provided the property owners are advised of the risks <br /> <br />PAGE 16 of 22 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 04/23/07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes From 04/09/07 [Page 16 of 22]