Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 9, 2007 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br />(14. #07-3271 JUDSON M. DAYTON, 825 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH, Continued) <br /> <br />Rahn indicated he is in agreement with the comments expressed by the Council. <br /> <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br /> <br />15. #07-3274 BRUCE PADDOCK, 1450 AND 1500 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD – <br />SUBDIVISION/VACATION/PRELIMINARY PLAT <br /> <br />George Stickney, BPS Properties, was present on behalf of Bruce Paddock. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are proposing a multi-faceted application with the ultimate goal of <br />improving the marketability and/or buildability of the two residential properties at the southern tip of <br />Bracketts Point. The application was previously brought forward as a sketch plan, which allowed for a <br />number of policy issues to be addressed by the Planning Commission and Council. <br /> <br />The proposal includes: <br />1. Vacation of the southerly 580 feet of Bracketts Point Road; <br />2. Replatting of Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Bracketts Point, to create: <br /> a. A new private road outlot serving 1450, 1480, and 1500 Bracketts Point Road; <br /> b. A 2.00 acre lakeshore lot to replace the 2.00 acre nonlakeshore lot at 1450; <br /> c. A 2.84 acre lakeshore lot to replace the 3.72 acre lakeshore lot at 1500; <br /> d. A new tennis court outlot, potentially to serve as a neighborhood amenity. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the revised road layout that was presented at their March 19th <br />meeting, and voted 7-0 to forward the application to the Council, generally following Staff’s <br />recommendation but with a number of revisions or caveats as outlined in Staff’s report. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated as it relates to the private road right-of-way width and pavement width, Staff would <br />conclude that a 20 foot road in the 40’/30’ corridor as proposed is reasonable as long as a 10 foot clear <br />space for snow storage is maintained either side of the paved road. This will require that a five foot <br />drainage and utility easement be created within the Headrick property; the standard ten foot drainage <br />and utility easement be established within Lot 1 among Outlot B; and a covenant be established <br />allowing no fences within ten feet either side of the pavement, as well as a covenant requiring that the <br />private road be plowed to its paved width and not allowed to be narrowed. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted that three of the four utility companies have indicated they have utility lines either within <br />the right-of-way to be vacated or within the existing drainage and utility easements to be vacated either <br />side of that corridor. The utility companies object to the vacation unless the applicant pays to have all <br />utilities relocated to under the new road. <br /> <br />The applicants have provided a signed agreement with the Headricks with regards to the road <br />realignment, use of the outlots, and other items. <br /> <br />The Council should confirm whether it accepts the concept of granting the necessary setback and <br />hardcover variances to allow the historic Woods cabin on Lot 1 to remain if/when the principal <br />residence on Lot 1 is removed or replaced. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />PAGE 15 of 22 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 04/23/07 <br />Approval of Council Minutes From 04/09/07 [Page 15 of 22]