Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 14, 2008 <br />7:00 o’clock a.m. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br />(4. #08-3351 BARRY TANNER ON BEHALF OF BROOK INVESTMENT, B-1 ZONING <br />DISTRICT, Continued) <br /> <br />c. The use shall not create traffic congestion, unsafe access, or parking needs that will cause <br /> inconvenience to adjoining properties. <br /> <br />d. The use will not create additional requirements at public cost for public services, in particular <br /> police services. <br /> <br /> e. The City Council may attach conditions to the conditional use permit, including limiting the <br /> hours of operation and the size of the use, to ensue the use is not operated in a way to be <br /> detrimental to any persons or property because of excessive traffic, noise, glare, odor, <br /> vibrations or other nuisances. <br /> <br />Turner stated the applicant has given an extension to the first of August. <br /> <br />Murphy noted the Planning Commission recommended that only beer and wine, not liquor, should be <br />permitted in conjunction with Commercial Recreation and that food should be served with the beer and <br />wine. Murphy asked whether the previous bowling alley had only 3.2 beer. <br /> <br />Turner stated that facility had beer and setups. <br /> <br />Murphy asked if there are differences between a beer license and a wine license. <br /> <br />Tanner stated it was his understanding the facility used to serve 3.2 beer and also had a license for setups. <br />Tanner indicated the bowling alley up the road provides 3.2 beer. <br /> <br />Murphy asked what a school or a training center would consist of under the definition of commercial <br />recreation. <br /> <br />Turner stated that would likely be a dance school or a karate school. <br /> <br />Murphy noted there are a large number of recreational activities available, and asked whether a problem <br />would be created if a particular use is not listed. <br /> <br />Mattick indicated it would not. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether a use that is not practical for the district should be listed, such as a movie <br />theatre. <br /> <br />Mattick recommended if the council does not feel the use is compatible with that district, it should be <br />deleted from the list. <br /> <br />Bremer commented she would prefer to have a movie theatre versus another karate school or training <br />school. <br /> <br />McMillan commented she has some concern regarding the use of the term event centers. <br /> <br /> <br />PAGE 3 of 11 <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 07/28/08 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 07/14/08 [Page 3 of 11]