Laserfiche WebLink
Precision Closers, Inc. <br /> 4315 !VGR � ;_ uF�i Vc �iVfUu�vD, iVil;`di�v:� � �� !612) 472 3219 <br /> �,�E�rc: sent, tc> the t�ix depxrLrnent for verificfiLic�n, [)ennis Hill <br /> rejected them because the legal description of the conveyance <br /> does not conform to the legal description assigned by Orono. <br /> Apparently the smaller portion taxes have all been applied to the <br /> PID ending in 32, which Dennis is indicating has to be corrected <br /> by Judy Gillis who is also being copied with this letter. Dennis <br /> i� further stating that I can record the contract after October <br /> 15, 1990, providing that the intersecting parcels have had their <br /> t�es paid in full. He is sug$esting that Orono can correct the <br /> tax description without changing the tag base because the <br /> amount of land to correct is small and just "corners". <br /> Nhile I am certainly not an attorney and do not feel that I can carry <br /> t his matter any further, I have consulted my own counsel and he <br /> feels that Molumhy should be allovred ta record his document as it <br /> was a District Court Action to establish the legal description of the <br /> lands that he is conveying. It is also my understanding that other <br /> mortgages have been recorded on adjacent parcels without the same <br /> c,�ilamity that Molumby seems to be experiencing. <br /> .7e;an, as you can see, all parties are being copied this letter. I would <br /> appreciate your reviewing your rec:ords to see if you can shed some <br /> light on this without involving a ma jor legal battle and unnecessary <br /> expense for all the parties. If as Dennis suspects, the t� valuation <br /> would not change for any of the parties, perhaps the City can correct <br /> its legal to c-.onform with the legal deacriptions which have apparently <br /> been passed as correct for some time. I have no way of knowing <br /> whether the ad jacent parcels are Torrens or Abstract, but the <br /> 'Porrens process should be straight forward in the establishment of <br /> the descriptionR because of the surveys required to establish <br /> bcsundary lir�rs for r�wnership. <br /> You had further indicated that there was a process required bp the <br /> City to ad just lot lines. It appears that all the owners of the <br /> ad jacent pieces should bP notified and certainly their lenders. I am <br /> not in a position to be able to initiate that process and this letter <br /> will probably be the only active involvement that I can take other <br /> than to assist with information that I have. The exception being, that <br /> I would appreciate Judy Gillis correctly applying the tax payments <br /> thzti, were teriderecie <br /> ;,�,.a�°�<�.-�,��� :..::�x�. . <br />