Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 8 <br />(4. #08-3378 MICHAEL AND JULIE WHITTINGTON, 1981 FAGERENESS POINT <br />ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Whittington stated the basement level has 10-foot ceilings, the main level has 9-foot ceilings, and <br />the second story has 8-foot ceilings. The height of the proposed house basically matches the <br />height of the neighbors’ houses. <br /> <br />White stated it would be useful to the Council on future applications if Staff could show how the <br />proposed house compares to the two neighboring homes. <br /> <br />Turner stated this house is the same height as the other homes in the area. <br /> <br />McMillan stated due to the hardship of the driveway and the need for the retaining walls due to <br />the topography, she would be in support of adding an extra 70 feet to the hardcover allowance to <br />the driveway, which would raise the amount of extra hardcover to 923 square feet. McMillan <br />stated the applicant could then determine the size of the patio as long as it fits within that <br />limitation. McMillan indicated she is not in favor of encroaching on the average lakeshore <br />setback. <br /> <br />McMillan moved, Bremer seconded, to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving <br />Application #08-3378, Michael and Julie Whittington, 1981Fagerness Point Road, granting <br />of a hardcover variance to allow 923 square feet of hardcover in addition to the 25 percent <br />allowed, and to deny the average lakeshore setback variance for the pergola and swimming <br />pool. <br /> <br />Murphy asked why the application has been delayed for the last six months. <br /> <br />Whittington indicated they pulled their application based on the state of the economy. <br /> <br />Murphy noted a number of major changes have occurred since this application was before the <br />Planning Commission, such as the removal of the pool. One of the issues he has with the <br />application is not having formal buildings plans depicting the deck in the front and the patio but <br />that he is basically in agreement with Council Member McMillan on the extra hardcover and the <br />pergola. <br /> <br />Whittington commented the items on his neighbors’ patios obstruct his view and that one option <br />is to have a temporary pergola that is not attached. Whittington noted they have a small parking <br />area located across the street that is paved and asked whether they could trade that hardcover for <br />additional patio area. <br /> <br />White asked whether that is already included in the calculation. <br /> <br />Turner indicated it is not since it is located on a separate zone. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if the applicant would like to table his application to think about his options, she <br />would be willing to withdraw her motion. <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/11/09 <br />Council Minutes 04/27/09 [Page 8 of 18]