Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 27, 2009 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />______________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />PAGE 7 <br />(4. #08-3378 MICHAEL AND JULIE WHITTINGTON, 1981 FAGERENESS POINT <br />ROAD, Continued) <br /> <br />Murphy stated he has a difficult time with the pergola and that a patio would be better than a <br />pergola since it does not obstruct the neighbors’ views. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what Staff would prefer to see as it relates to hardcover. <br /> <br />Turner stated based on the topography of the lot, Staff feels the proposed location is the best spot <br />for the residence and that some additional hardcover is required for the driveway. Staff feels the <br />hardcover should be kept to the 25 percent limit plus the additional hardcover the Council deems <br />appropriate for the driveway. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if there was one item in particular that Staff is opposed to. <br /> <br />Turner indicated there is not. <br /> <br />Bremer noted this application has changed since the review by the Planning Commission and <br />asked whether the Planning Commission should review it again. <br /> <br />Turner stated in her opinion it is not necessary for the Planning Commission to review it again. <br /> <br />Bremer commented it is not the City Council’s job to redesign the house and that she would be <br />okay with the hardcover as proposed at 31.9 percent but that the issue is the pergola. Bremer <br />noted this is a wide lot and that his neighbor has a 100-foot lot but was not given any additional <br />hardcover than what he was allowed even though he had similar topography issues. Bremer <br />stated she would be in favor of allowing the 12-foot driveway. <br /> <br />Whittington pointed out that a number of his neighbors have hardcover in excess of 31 percent, <br />with one property owner on Shadywood being granted 38.6 percent, which was just approved <br />three years ago. Whittington indicated he could provide other examples if the Council would <br />like. Whittington indicated he is unsure how the house could be reduced. <br /> <br />White recommended the applicant look at possible ways to reduce the size of the house as well as <br />ways to make the house more energy efficient. <br /> <br />Franchot stated it comes down to reasonable use of the lot, and that by removing the pool and the <br />neighbors being supportive of the plan, in his view it is a very reasonable house and that the <br />pergola is not egregious. Franchot indicated he would support the house plan as proposed and <br />would also be supportive of the driveway being either 10 feet or 12 feet. <br /> <br />Whittington noted the current house consists of 4,300 finished square feet and that the proposed <br />house is at 3,100 square feet. The hardcover is also being reduced by approximately 20 percent <br />from what currently exists. <br /> <br />Turner displayed a picture of the proposed residence. <br /> <br />White asked what the height of this residence is as compared to the neighbor’s. <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/11/09 <br />Council Minutes 04/27/09 [Page 7 of 18]