My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
12-12-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 11:50:10 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 12:02:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
298
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(16. LURTON PARK IMPROVEMENTS, Continued) <br /> <br />burn and reseeding of the open field area with native prairie vegetation; similar burn/re-seeding in the <br />adjacent Hennepin County right—of-way and around the MnDOT wetland in the southeast corner of the <br />site; trail improvements (clearing as needed and wood chips); adding signage along the park boundaries <br />and buckthorn removal. <br /> <br />The City had received a quote from Prairie Restorations, Inc., in April of 2011 for this work. Subsequent <br />requests for quotes from four additional firms resulted in only one additional response from Minnesota <br />Native Landscapes, which substituted herbicide applications for the controlled burn. <br /> <br />Based on the two quotes, Staff is recommending that Council accept the proposal of PRI for the field <br />re-vegetation project. PRI has also quoted expanding the re-seeding project to include the Hennepin <br />County right-of-way for an additional $8,950. Staff has not yet had contact with Hennepin County <br />regarding whether they would allow that work. <br /> <br />Staff has met with Mark Simenson of PRI and with Van Erickson to discuss this project as well as other <br />potential site improvement projects. PRI has provided a spreadsheet with cost estimates for the various <br />potential site improvements. Van Erickson has indicated he believes the two highest priority projects are <br />the field re-seeding and buckthorn removal. <br /> <br />Council has not had any in-depth discussion regarding a buckthorn removal program for this site so Staff <br />has asked Mark Simenson to attend tonight's Council meeting to answer any questions the Council may <br />have. <br /> <br />Staff recommends accepting the quote of PRI, Inc., for the field burn/re-seeding project in the amount of <br />$13,200. Council should advise Staff as to whether there is support for expanding this to the Hennepin <br />County right-of-way if allowed by the County. Staff further recommends that Council provide Staff with <br />direction regarding a buckthorn removal program for Lurton Park. The project would not start until next <br />spring, which would give the city time to decide whether the Hennepin County right-of-way work will be <br />included in the project. <br /> <br />Rahn commented in his view the City can move ahead with the bid for $13,200 and then ask Hennepin <br />County whether the other work within the right-of-way can be done. Rahn stated he was unsure how <br />many improvements were going to be made to the park. <br /> <br />Franchot asked what the Lurtons’ expectations were regarding the buckthorn. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in his view they feel the re-seeding and burn are a higher priority than the buckthorn. Next <br />spring the City does need to perform some work on the trail. Staff is hoping to get some volunteers to <br />remove debris and place wood chips down. Gaffron stated in his opinion the removal of the buckthorn is <br />something that should be done since it is not well established at this point. <br /> <br />Franchot noted the City has approximately $130,000 left from the Lurtons' gift to the City and asked <br />whether that was intended as an endowment. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it was intended for maintenance of the park and that there were no specific changes as to <br />how the remainder of the money was to be used. Gaffron noted that if the City is going to use the interest <br />from the $130,000, it would not amount to more than a couple thousand dollars a year. Gaffron stated it <br />is not an endowment at this point. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 12/12/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/28/2011 <br />[Page 12 of 16]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.