Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2011 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />  Page 8 of 28   <br />   <br />(7. #11-3518 WILLIAM H. KOCH, 3251 CASCO CIRCLE, Continued) <br /> <br />The Planning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the hardcover variances to allow the <br />driveway reconfiguration as well as the lakeside patio. <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and hardcover for the stairs. The applicant <br />should submit a revised survey showing the proposed grading plan and an engineered design for review <br />prior to issuance of the administrative permits for grading. The Council should discuss the additional <br />hardcover requested within the 75-250 foot zone. <br /> <br />Bill Koch, Applicant, stated when they purchased the home, there was a lake-side patio that was approved <br />which was never constructed. Koch pointed out the area of the patio on the proposed plans. He has <br />contacted Meadowood, who has done a considerable amount of work with permeable pavers, and they <br />have designed a patio plan and drainage system that feeds into both rain gardens that are on site currently. <br /> <br />Out of that 142 square foot area, there is one area that would be a planting area. There would also be a <br />retaining wall to protect the integrity of the rain garden. The stair system would be done by Design <br />Concepts. Koch noted the City was insistent on getting an engineer to review and approve it. Koch <br />indicated he has spoken with 27 engineers to see if they would be willing to review and approve it. He <br />finally found an engineer from Wisconsin who did visit the site and has put his stamp of approval on the <br />plan. A grading plan has also been completed and provided to the City. <br /> <br />Rahn noted the home is only five years old and that the City should have a survey showing whether the <br />patio was approved. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated there was an approved patio that was not constructed. The as-built survey completed this <br />year showed that the site exceeds the 29.9 percent hardcover that was approved. Some minor changes <br />were done on the lot that resulted in the increase. The City did not have an as-built survey requirement at <br />that time. The house was built as approved but there were some landscaping changes resulting in the <br />increased hardcover. <br /> <br />Rahn noted the hardcover is currently at 32 percent and the applicant is proposing 38.9 percent. <br /> <br />Koch indicated there was a hardcover variance granted at the time the house was constructed. <br /> <br />Rahn asked if the 2006 survey is in the Council packet. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it should be in the packet as well as the resolution. <br /> <br />Rahn stated the driveway needs to be enlarged to be functional but that he is having a difficult time <br />understanding why it is over on hardcover since the driveway is less than what was approved. Rahn <br />indicated he is not sure where the overages occurred. <br /> <br />Koch noted they did not construct the house. <br /> <br />Rahn stated in his view the driveway needs to be redone and the stairs are something that would typically <br />be allowed, but that he would not be in favor of the patio until he receives additional information on the <br />hardcover overage. Rahn commented that it is a matter of choice on what they want to construct and still <br />comply with the hardcover requirements. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/26/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/12/2011 <br />[Page 8 of 28]