My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-12-2011 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-12-2011 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2015 11:02:20 AM
Creation date
4/8/2015 10:54:17 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 22, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 7 of 14 <br /> <br />(7. ORONO ORCHARD ROAD AGREEMENT WITH MCES, Continued) <br /> <br />Rahn stated if the Metropolitan Council is willing to partner with the City on the project; it would make <br />sense to move ahead with the project. <br /> <br />Rahn requested Kellogg provide the Council with the cost differences if the City were to do a like, kind, <br />and size reconstruction on Old Crystal Bay Road versus a mill and overlay. Rahn noted they have talked <br />in the past about substandard base in some areas and asked at what distances the soil borings were <br />performed. <br /> <br />Kellogg indicated there were five borings performed for the total length of the roadway and that generally <br />they attempt to pick the areas where poor soils are anticipated. <br /> <br />Rahn asked whether that cost comparison could be brought back to the Council in two weeks. <br /> <br />Kellogg indicated they can prepare a cost estimate for the Council and bring it back to them in two weeks. <br />Kellogg noted Old Crystal Bay Road is a state aid route and that if they are going to use state aid dollars, <br />the road will need to meet some minimum widths. <br /> <br />Rahn stated he would like to leave it up to the City Engineer to determine what the bare minimums are. <br /> <br />Kellogg asked if he would like the cost estimates for the minimum standards on a mill and overlay project <br />versus the cost estimates to reconstruct the two-way roadway to minimum standards. <br /> <br />Rahn stated that is what he is looking for and that his intention is to not spend millions of dollars and <br />replace infrastructure that is in good shape. Rahn stated he would like to see what the difference is <br />between the two. Rahn asked whether the Council could move along with that in conjunction with the <br />Orono Orchard Road project. <br /> <br />Kellogg stated the two projects could go along on parallel paths if the City Council makes a decision on <br />how they want to proceed in the very near future. <br /> <br />Rahn asked what the next steps would be. Rahn commented the quicker the City does the work on Old <br />Crystal Bay Road, the more the City will benefit from the engineering that has already been done. <br /> <br />Kellogg noted a mill and overlay would not require plans and specs and that he could easily update the <br />cost estimate later this year by figuring out the percent of increase in the cost index. If it is a complete <br />reconstruct to minimum standards, he would suggest that the existing report be modifying by adding an <br />option three. The two options already included in the report were a wider roadway with turn lanes and a <br />wider roadway with roundabouts. Kellogg indicated adding a third option to the report would be a fairly <br />simple process. <br /> <br />Printup commented in his view that is a good idea for Old Crystal Bay Road. Printup stated partnering up <br />with the Metropolitan Council on Orono Orchard Road is also a good idea. <br /> <br />McMillan commented the Council cannot forget about Crystal Bay Road and that she would like to see <br />both roads dealt with next summer. McMillan stated she appreciates the tight time schedule but that she <br />would like to leave ample time to obtain public comment. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/12/2011 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/22/2011 <br />[Page 7 of 14]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.