My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
12-09-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2024 12:34:07 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:10:46 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
631
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 25, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 9 of 29 <br />(3. CSAH 112 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, Continued) <br /> <br />Grube noted the trail cost for the City is $4,300 in this segment. Grube pointed out the location of the <br />trail. <br /> <br />McMillan stated if Long Lake agrees to the trail, she would be agreeable to it. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to support the trail in Segment 4 if Long Lake is agreeable to it. <br /> <br />Grube stated he would recommend the trail to both cities since it is a very important element for the <br />future. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if there is a trail going east of Old Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />Grube stated the answer is no, because once you get past that location, people will have an easier access <br />to the trail down to the Highway 12 area. At this point, for Old Long Lake Road, the trail was originally <br />on the south side and it was not included on the Orono side. Grube indicated it did make some sense to <br />bring it over to Underhill and cross at that point. Grube noted the lion’s share of this trail would be the <br />responsibility of Long Lake. <br /> <br />Grube stated it is his understanding the City Council is a no on the utility burial options and check with <br />Long Lake on the trail. Grube asked if the Council is in favor of additional lighting and streetscape at the <br />Luce Line Bridge. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the City Council to not go forward with the streetscape and lighting in the area of <br />the Luce Line Bridge. <br /> <br />Grube indicated he would put these options in writing and send them to the City Administrator. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if Orono would be able to see Long Lake’s comments. <br /> <br />Grube indicated he would provide that once he receives it. Grube noted Long Lake met last week to <br />discuss their options but has not gotten back to him at this point. <br /> <br />Loren Schoenzeit, 4480 Forest Lake Landing, asked whether the traffic control lights will be at the same <br />quality level or more sophisticated. Schoenzeit noted the road to the school is used after hours and it is <br />possible to miss the left turn signal which results in someone waiting there while the lights go through <br />another cycle. Schoenzeit stated he would like to encourage Hennepin County to consider improving the <br />quality of the traffic control signals. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated when he hears no lights; he hopes that means no additional lights. Schoenzeit noted <br />these are important intersections and they need to be lighted to some extent. <br /> <br />Grube indicated he would agree with Mr. Schoenzeit. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if Hennepin County would do redoing the traffic signals at the time of construction. <br /> <br />Grube indicated they would be. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 12/09/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/25/2013 <br />[Page 9 of 29]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.