Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 25, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />    Page 8 of 29   <br />(3. CSAH 112 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, Continued) <br /> <br />Printup and Bremer indicated they would go along with whatever Long Lake decides. <br /> <br />Turner stated if Long Lake elects to install lighting on the south side of the road and Orono elects not to <br />light on the north, it may not solve the lighting situation and it would appear somewhat lopsided. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the current lights in Long Lake are not very effective and asked whether better lighting <br />would be installed. <br /> <br />Grube indicated he is unable to say yes at this point but that Hennepin County would want to make the <br />lighting more efficient as well as downward casting. Grube noted the current light fixtures are older and <br />not the most efficient. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the lights would be staggered on both the north and south sides. <br /> <br />Turner stated the plan does show staggered lighting, which provides for a little more uniform lighting, but <br />that they could as be put across from each other. Turner stated they would likely propose the staggered <br />lighting since the lighting would be more uniform. <br /> <br />McMillan commented the lighting looks better staggered. McMillan indicated she is not in favor of <br />lighting west of Willow, but if Long Lake is agreeable to lights up to Willow, she would be okay with <br />staggering the lighting on Orono’s side up to Willow. <br /> <br />Levang indicated that would be fine for that segment. <br /> <br />Grube stated this is one of the elements where he feels Hennepin County should bring some money to the <br />table. Grube stated his understanding so far is that the Council is not in favor of lights west of Willow but <br />that they would be willing to have lights east of Willow depending upon the reaction of Long Lake. <br />Grube stated he is also gleaning from the Council that the trail and the off road facility should stay and <br />that they would like to check with Long Lake on the streetscape. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how the Council feels about Segment 4. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is not interested in having very much streetscape in that area and that she is not very <br />interested in the utility burial since Orono will not gain much by burying the utilities. Levang noted there <br />is not a significant amount of traffic in that area. Levang commented she likes the improvements along <br />the lake and asked whether a utility pole would interfere with that. <br /> <br />Turner noted the piece they are talking about for Orono is the easterly part of the cemetery. The project <br />advisor has made the same recommendation to Long Lake for the power poles along the east side of the <br />road. Turner indicated he is not sure what Long Lake will decide. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he is in agreement with Council Member Levang. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if he is opposed to the trail. <br /> <br />Printup stated he would be opposed to the trail. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 12/09/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/25/2013 <br />[Page 8 of 29]