Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 22 of 36   <br />(8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br />WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Robyn Johnson, 4730 North Arm Drive, stated she is here to ask the City Council to uphold the <br />recreational guidance for a golf course or delay the decision. The residents that are here tonight represent <br />hundreds of acres of land that is worth millions of dollars and many of them are here because they feel the <br />cart is before the horse. The residents know this is a lovely piece of land that is sandwiched between two <br />bays of Lake Minnetonka which the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District currently classifies as a C plus <br />or C minus in terms of water quality. The Watershed District restricts swimming and recreational <br />activities in both of these bays at times due to the nitrogen content of the water. Both of these bays are <br />within the 1,000 square foot restriction but they are actually within 100 to 200 feet of that. The <br />topography is extraordinary. As the consultant said tonight, the data is preliminary and the residents have <br />not known about the details of this project for more than 30 days. <br /> <br />Johnson indicated she read on the City’s website that the City Council is elected to fashion policies that <br />determine this community’s present and future well being, which extends to this moment in time and goes <br />for this time and hundreds of years from now. Orono benefits today from significant tax revenue. The <br />City receives seven million in taxable revenues with a balanced budget. Johnson stead she read in the <br />paper last weekend that Orono is ranked towards the top in the country for median values due to a number <br />of reasons. Johnson stated she does not believe there is a financial imperative that Orono’s housing be <br />expanded immediately. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the application that has been presented to the City Council is an investment backed <br />exemption that would not stand up in a court of law if the City denied the property owner the right to sell. <br />The application is based on a concept and not an engineered plan. The sketch plan has been described by <br />the consultant as an illustration of an idea. The City Council’s decision will leave many unanswered <br />questions relating to traffic safety, watershed and wetlands, water quality, aquifers, flooding stormwater <br />management, lake pollution, population expansion, marketability of homes, depreciation of land values, <br />city infrastructure, crime, and fire protection. Johnson stated the resulting aesthetics will be that the <br />neighbors will be looking at the backside of these homes that will encroach into their skyline vision. <br />Johnson stated this development will have an aesthetic impact no matter how much green space is around <br />it. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the citizens of Orono pay a premium to live here and that they benefit from the <br />Community Management Plan. The citizens elected the members to the City Council to implement the <br />objectives of the Community Management Plan. Johnson stated to her knowledge Orono has never <br />developed a subdivision of this magnitude. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated there has not been a similar development. <br /> <br />Johnson noted the Eagan development is not located between bodies of water and does not contain the <br />same number of homes as what is being proposed. This property was never put on the market and <br />nobody was given the opportunity to determine whether there is another use for it. Johnson stated there <br />are a number of issues that need to be further explored prior to changing the zoning and that in her view <br />this plan is not compatible with existing and future land uses or in the best interests of the City’s <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 11/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/12/2013 <br />[Page 22 of 36]