My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
11-25-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:48:09 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 3:00:20 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
553
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, November 12, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 21 of 36 <br />(8. #13-3638 and 13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC (PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRANT <br />WENKSTERN (LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Daniels stated in his view this is a good project and that he would ask the City Council to move ahead on <br />the Comprehensive plan amendment and keep the application moving forward. <br />Stephen Hosmer, 1040 West Cove Lane, Minnetrista, stated he and his wife moved out to this area for the <br />open space. The area is beautiful and is a jewel in the crown of Orono. A site like this is not found <br />anywhere else in the City. Hosmer stated the presentations by the potential developer were excellent and <br />provided a vision of what the development could be. <br /> <br />Hosmer stated he would like to step back for a minute and go back to the first part of the application, <br />which is the Comprehensive Plan amendment. The Comprehensive Plan was done in the form of a <br />promise to the community and the surrounding communities that this is what the people in the community <br />could expect going forward. It says if open space becomes available, the City should attempt to acquire <br />that open space. What has happened is that a group of concerned citizens have gotten together to come up <br />with alternatives to the housing development and retain the open space. Hosmer stated the only way that <br />can happen is if the residents are given an opportunity to come up with their own concepts. <br /> <br />Hosmer noted the consultant indicated retaining the current open space is not viable, but is that known for <br />a fact. Hosmer asked whether residents have been given an opportunity to see if there are other ways to <br />retain the open space. The consultant also said that continued use of the golf course is not feasible. <br />Hosmer stated while the current way of running the golf course may not be feasible, there perhaps are <br />other ways that it could become financially feasible. <br /> <br />Hosmer stated the last point the consultant said was that the City cannot compel a single property owner <br />to provide public area or space. Hosmer noted the group is not asking the Council to compel the owner to <br />maintain this open space but that they are requesting an opportunity to acquire the space from him and <br />make him financially whole. The group is saying they will find a way where his needs will be met and <br />the directives of the Community Management Plan can also be followed, which is to keep, encourage, and <br />acquire open space. <br /> <br />Hosmer stated the Mayor indicated on the previous application that the development would be a short- <br />term gain for the developer which sometimes comes at the long-term expense of the City or words to that <br />effect. Hosmer stated in his view that is the case here. The developer will come in and be gone but <br />Orono will be left with that property. If you look over this contiguous section of approximately 120 acres <br />consisting of woods and open space, it will not be the same as houses clustered between roads and cul-de- <br />sacs. The City Council has a responsibility to consider that under the Community Management Plan and <br />how it will affect the community going forward. The City Council owes it to the residents to give them <br />60 days to come up with alternatives. The residents only just became aware of the proposal recently and <br />that the decision should be tabled for 60 days so the residents can develop something on their own. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 11/25/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 11/12/2013 <br />[Page 21 of 36]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.