My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-14-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
10-14-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:44:49 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 2:38:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
304
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 23, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 4 of 11 <br />(4. #13-3628 THOMAS POTTER ON BEHALF OF RODNEY AND BARBARA BURWELL, <br />1100 MILLSTON ROAD, VARIANCES – RESOLUTION TABLED, Continued) <br /> <br />Levang asked how many stalls the garage would have. <br /> <br />Potter indicated there will be four. <br /> <br />Levang stated the hardship issue is a factor that needs to be taken into consideration on this application. <br /> <br />Bremer asked if there were any public comments regarding the application at the Planning Commission <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Levang noted it was placed on the Consent Agenda. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated there were no public comments received. <br /> <br />Potter pointed out there is a fair amount of woods on the neighboring property that screens the structure <br />and that the building is below the maximum height restrictions. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it should not be the obligation of the next door neighbor to provide the screening and <br />that trees do eventually die. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he does not want the City Council to get the impression the Planning Commission did not <br />do their due diligence on this application. Reconfiguring this side loading garage is not possible since it <br />cannot be reduced down to 20 feet and it cannot be moved forward due to the turning radii. Thiesse <br />stated the applicants cannot reconfigure that structure in that location. Because of that, there is some <br />hardship in that the only way it can work is in that location unless it is reconfigured for a different spot on <br />the property. Thiesse indicated the Planning Commission looked at the application from that standpoint. <br /> <br />Levang asked if what does not work is the four-stall garage. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated loading from that direction does not work since it cannot be reduced down to 18 feet. The <br />garage either has to be reconfigured to be loaded from a different direction or placed in a different <br />location. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she does not want to get into designing a new garage <br /> <br />Curtis stated the property owner had indicated the removal of the existing garage provided more open <br />space on the property in general and not that another structure could not be constructed there. <br /> <br />Potter stated they are widening up the area by the garages and creating more green space on the property. <br /> <br />Levang stated it still comes down to a practical difficulty. <br /> <br />Bremer stated it would improve the massing appearance and would provide a benefit but that she does <br />have a concern about it and is in agreement with Mayor McMillan. <br /> <br />Levang stated she concurs as well. <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 10/14/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 09/23/2013 [Page 4 of 11]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.