10-14-2013 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, September 23, 2013 7:00 o’clock p.m. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Page 5 of 11 (4. #13-3628 THOMAS POTTER ON BEHALF OF RODNEY AND BARBARA BURWELL, 1100 MILLSTON ROAD, VARIANCES – RESOLUTION TABLED, Continued) Anderson stated she also concurs and that it is not so much the fact that it is an oversized structure but the fact that the applicant could find another location, especially with a property this size, which would be conforming. Bremer stated if a conforming location is found, she would be fine with that and that she would not require the applicant to come back before the City Council. Bremer stated the City Council could approve the second oversized structure but without the setback variance, which would leave it up to the applicant to decide whether he wants to redesign the structure. Curtis indicated there would also be a principal structure setback. The applicant could add on to the house and be at the same 30-foot setback. McMillan noted a new resolution would need to be drafted. Mattick stated the resolution would need to approve the oversized structure but deny the variance request for the side yard setback. The applicant at that point would have the option to construct a structure within the parameters of that footprint or up to that footprint but they would have to meet all setbacks and other requirements. Mattick asked what the time deadline is on this application. Curtis indicated it is October 19. Levang asked if Mr. Potter understands what the City Council is requesting. Potter indicated he does. Bremer noted it would be approved tonight but without the variance. Mattick stated he would not have to come back to the City Council if the structure is relocated to a conforming spot. Potter asked if they would need to go through a whole new process if they redesign the building. Mattick stated the Council will need to clarify whether they are talking about approving this exact configuration or a certain footprint but in a different location. Potter indicated they will not be able to place the garage anywhere else on the property since the applicant will not be able to physically access it. McMillan stated the best solution would be to table the application and redesign the plan to make it conforming in that location. Mattick asked how quickly the plans would be put together. Potter indicated he would need to meet with the homeowner first. Item #03 - CC Agenda - 10/14/2013 Approval of Council Minutes 09/23/2013 [Page 5 of 11]