My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
09-09-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2015 2:35:01 PM
Creation date
4/7/2015 2:30:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 26, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 8 of 21 <br />(7. #13-3621 THOMAS WASMOEN ON BEHALF OF JOHN BESSESEN, 2445, 2455, 2465 <br />SHADYWOOD ROAD, 2560 KELLY AVENUE, AND PID 20-117-23-11-0032 – SKETCH PLAN <br />REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated they are looking at a development for people 55 and older and that it will not generate as <br />much traffic as some of the other residential developments in the City. Wasmoen indicated they are <br />attempting to create a walkable community and provide some vitality to the area. The green buffer and <br />wetlands along Kelly will be maintained and most of the proposed units will also have their own buffer <br />from Kelly Avenue which will not be visible until you get up by the grocery store. <br /> <br />Levang indicated she is opposed to the density since they are proposing approximately five units per acre. <br />Levang stated she does like the buffer along Kelly but that it appears the area would need to be rezoned, <br />which she is opposed to. Levang indicated she also has great concerns regarding what the Conservation <br />Design will show and that the overall density is a major concern at this point. <br /> <br />Levang asked whether they own any of the property at this point. <br /> <br />Wasmoen indicated they would not purchase the property until they can move forward with the <br />development agreement. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she also has issues with the single-family parcels in the middle of the higher density <br />housing. McMillan noted the idea of creating an RPUD was brought up as a way to perhaps cluster some <br />of the units but that in her view the density shown on the concept plan will not work. McMillan stated the <br />clear-cut land might be okay for some townhomes but that she would like to see lower density in this area. <br /> <br />McMillan noted commercial can have as much impact as townhomes and that perhaps the City does not <br />need commercial going that far down County Road 19. McMillan stated there is some merit to looking at <br />slightly higher density in that area but the area between the church and north of there is questionable <br />about whether it should be rezoned. McMillan stated she is not ready to put in high-density residential <br />housing in this area. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated they are not looking to construct high density housing and that they are attempting to <br />work with the grades and keep the scale as residential as possible. <br /> <br />McMillan noted Kelly Avenue is a single-family residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Bremer noted there are townhomes currently by the bowling alley on Kelly Avenue. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the townhomes could perhaps be located off of Shadywood but that the City needs to <br />protect Kelly Avenue given the water problems. <br /> <br />Wasmoen noted they are only looking for a pedestrian link onto Kelly and that they are cognizant of the <br />water problems. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the Freshwater Institute is also not very commercial looking. McMillan asked if retail <br />would be allowed in the B4 District. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/09/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/26/2013 [Page 8 of 21]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.