Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 26, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />    Page 7 of 21   <br />(7. #13-3621 THOMAS WASMOEN ON BEHALF OF JOHN BESSESEN, 2445, 2455, 2465 <br />SHADYWOOD ROAD, 2560 KELLY AVENUE, AND PID 20-117-23-11-0032 – SKETCH PLAN <br />REVIEW, Continued) <br /> <br />Wasmoen noted the Planning Commission raised a concern about the large number of trees that might be <br />lost. A tree inventory will be done and there will be a significant effort made during the design process to <br />protect as many trees as possible. The buffer along the wetlands will not be disrupted. In addition, a <br />market study will also be completed to make sure there is a demand for this type of housing. <br /> <br />Wasmoen noted other comments received from the Planning Commission involved the process of design <br />and that it is their intention to include the neighbors in the discussion process but that they would like to <br />gain the input of the City Council first before proceeding any further. <br /> <br />McMillan asked whether there would be any stormwater ponding on the site. McMillan noted the site is <br />pretty maxed out with homes. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated they have preliminarily contemplated that. The driveways would be constructed with <br />more of a pervious material and the green spaces would be areas for gardens and areas that can absorb <br />rainfall. Wasmoen noted Kelly Avenue at times floods from the wetlands and that it is not their intention <br />to divert any more water into those areas. One option is to divert some of the water from the wetlands or <br />divert it toward Shadywood, but they have not gotten into the details of that at this point. <br /> <br />Bremer asked what the status is of acquiring the properties since the plan changes drastically depending <br />on the number of properties that are obtained. <br /> <br />Wasmoen indicated Mr. Besseman has knowledge of the availability of a number of the sites and that they <br />have to negotiate purchase with the owners at some point. Wasmoen stated the development will be <br />between 44 and 62 units depending on the number of lots acquired. <br /> <br />McMillan asked how many units would be in one of the row houses. <br /> <br />Wasmoen stated the row house would have a smaller footprint and would consist of two stories. The row <br />houses would be located closer together for a total of eight and would be located primarily on the Nelson <br />property. Wasmoen indicated a row house would be a single unit and there would be four homes in a row <br />at two different locations. <br /> <br />Anderson commented there are a number of concerns she has with regard to the level of density. <br />Anderson stated in her view the Conservation Design is very critical for this site and that there is not <br />much of a buffer being proposed between this development and the church as well as the slope. <br /> <br />Wasmoen indicated the Conservation Design would be part of the design process and that at this time <br />they are attempting to gauge the interest of the City for this type of development before proceeding any <br />further. Wasmoen noted they omitted some trees for clarity on the plan but that there would be trees on <br />every property. In addition, the green area by the church is also not depicted. The driveway is shown to <br />be as efficient as possible but it can be moved slightly away from the property lines in order to add <br />additional green buffer areas. <br /> <br />Item #03 - CC Agenda - 09/09/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/26/2013 [Page 7 of 21]