My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
08-26-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:42:04 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 2:22:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 12, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br /> Page 9 of 37 <br />(6. #13-3606 LUKE KUJAWA O YOUR BOAT CLUB, 1444 SHORELINE DRIVE – <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> <br />The third requested item was evidence of property ownership status and contact information for the <br />responsible parties or site managers, including copies of any purchase agreements, lease agreements, and <br />any other useful ownership/responsibility documentation. The applicant has submitted a warranty deed <br />indicating that ownership of the two residential lots is now under EOF Investments, LLC, whose manager <br />is Christy Kujawa. The applicant is now owner of the residential lots. A copy of the lease for the rental <br />house at 1442 has also been submitted. Gaffron noted information about the current ownership status and <br />lease status of the main marina site at 1444 has not been submitted. <br /> <br />The fourth requested item requires the applicant to provide a diagram depicting how the in-water slips and <br />parking stalls are apportioned to the various tenant users and to describe how this apportionment and the <br />use of parking stalls for boat display impacts customer parking and pedestrian crossings of Shoreline <br />Drive. No information was submitted as to this request. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the fifth requested item requires the applicant to provide a copy of his NPDEs permit and <br />evidence of compliance or certification of no exposure if applicable. Gaffron indicated he did spend <br />some time reviewing the MPCA website with regard to stormwater management permits for industrial <br />activity and was able to find a variety of materials. The applicant has made inquires to the MPCA and has <br />indicated he is not clear as to what is required. The applicant has indicated they will comply with <br />whatever is required but the application must be through the marina owner and not a tenant. <br /> <br />Requested Item No. 6 requires submittal of evidence of liability insurance for all uses occurring at the <br />site, including River Valley Power and Sport. The applicant has provided that; although, one has not <br />been provided for River Valley. <br /> <br />Item No. 7 is submittal of a written response to expressed Council concerns as to how the boat club <br />and/or other operations on the site are compliant or can become and remain compliant with necessary <br />CUP findings 9, 11, and 12 regarding impacts on neighboring properties, creation of nuisances, and traffic <br />issues. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Finding No. 9 is that the use is not expected to substantially impair the use and <br />enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the <br />area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. Finding No. 11 states that <br />the use should not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise, glare, vibration, odors, fumes, dust, <br />electrical interference, and general unsightliness. Finding No. 12 states the use should not cause <br />excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable <br />inconvenience to adjoining properties, traffic congestion or unsafe access. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the applicant to some extent has addressed the parking concerns. Orono’s building official <br />has submitted a report stating that while the building is unsightly and in disrepair, it does not meet the <br />definition of a hazardous building. The City of Orono does not have a housing code to address the issue <br />of aesthetics or disrepair. <br /> <br />Police Chief Farniok has been asked to document complaints and he has submitted a memo listing all of <br />the incidents responded to in the area of the marinas since 2011. Staff has been advised verbally that <br />there have not been any further incidents since the memo was submitted. <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 08/26/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 08/12/2013 [Page 9 of 37]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.