My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-24-2013 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2013
>
06-24-2013 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2015 10:31:24 AM
Creation date
4/7/2015 1:58:02 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, June 10, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Page 25 of 32 <br />(9. #13-3606 LUKE KUJAWA OF YOUR BOAT CLUB, 1444 SHORELINE DRIVE, CUP <br />AMENDMENT, Continued) <br /> <br />Johnson stated they have a responsibility to protect their biggest investment, which is their house. <br />Johnson indicated he and his wife have never been involved in the government process, never attended a <br />Planning or City Council meeting, and have never called the police because of an annoyance. Johnson <br />stated in his view they are very tolerant people and that they have become accustomed to that building <br />that is right on the property line. However, there are nightly parties at the house by boat club employees, <br />the house has Christmas lights on it year-round, and there are people shooting BB guns and ink ball guns <br />on a regular basis. Johnson stated they were startled by what they thought was a high caliber gunshot and <br />called the police, which was a big deal. <br /> <br />Johnson stated what he finds interesting, however, is that the onus is on the adjacent property owner to be <br />calling the police rather than the property owner addressing the problems. The recommendation of the <br />Planning Commission was that they need our help in documenting this and to call the police. Johnson <br />indicated they went home after the meeting and there was a party going on in there. Johnson stated if <br />they were there simply cleaning the place out, they would have applauded them and not called the <br />meeting, which was an indication of the management approach they are taking. <br /> <br />Johnson stated there was also an assertion that he should have brought his concerns to the property owner <br />rather than going to the Planning Commission meeting. Johnson questioned why the burden is on him to <br />approach the property owner rather than the property owner or City addressing the problems. Johnson <br />stated he is merely a person who bought a house next to a residential property and that the onus should <br />not be on them to deal with the situation. <br /> <br />Johnson stated the Planning Commission meeting was the first time that they had met the owners of the <br />boat club but not once did they ever approach them and ask how things were going. Johnson stated he <br />likes the employees of the boat club and that this is not some personal vendetta. The question is whether <br />how they are conducting their business is reasonable. <br /> <br />Johnson commented by living next door, they have the unique advantage point of seeing everything on <br />the lot. The deteriorated house was there when they purchased the property but they were not aware of <br />the way it was being used. Johnson indicated they did check with City Staff prior to purchasing the <br />property to see if this was a residential property. Johnson stated the expansion will put more pressure on <br />their site, which is unreasonable and is going to adversely affect the value of their property. Johnson <br />stated he does not mean this with any disrespect, but that they would prefer not to be here tonight or <br />involved in this situation. Johnson stated they are here because they feel they have to protect their <br />interests. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he would like the City Council to ensure that the conditions of the CUP are followed <br />through on. Johnson noted he did read through 100 and some pages in preparation for this meeting and <br />found that there was no inspection by any city official that said the property was inspected on this day and <br />this day to make sure the conditions of the CUP were being met. Johnson stated when we were told by <br />the Planning Commission to call the police the next time there was a problem and they did that, the police <br />said there was nothing they can do about it since the house is being used as a residential property. <br />Johnson stated they are stuck in the middle of the process and no one is looking out for them. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda 06/24/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 06/10/2013 [Page 25 of 32]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.