Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 13, 2013 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />   Page 24 of 26   <br />(14. LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT (LMCD) 2014 BUDGET, Continued) <br /> <br />As it relates to Orono, for 2013, the City’s total levy is $58,406. Option one would increase it by <br />approximately $100 and Option 2 would go up an additional $7,700. <br /> <br />Printup commented it is impressive that over the last three or four years the levies have been kept low. <br /> <br />Nybeck requested the City Council indicate which option they would prefer by the end of the month. <br /> <br />Levang asked what would be eliminated as a result of the reduction in AIS management and prevention. <br /> <br />Nybeck indicated that would likely come from a reduction in boat inspections. <br /> <br />Levang asked how many boats would be inspected versus the prior year. <br /> <br />Nybeck stated in 2013 there will be nine accesses that would be covered by watercraft inspectors this <br />year. The DNR will cover Grays, Maxwell, North Arm and Spring Park. On the weekends during the <br />peak periods, which are generally later morning through the evening hours, there will be DNR inspectors. <br />The LMCD inspectors will be covering Halstad’s Bay, Crook’s, Carstons and Wayzata Bay, which are <br />lower volume public access points. This year the inspectors will basically only be performing Level 1 <br />inspections. Level 2 allows inspectors to go on the boat to check on live wells if needed and <br />decontaminate boats. The LMCD Board is looking at the idea of purchasing of a decontamination unit at <br />the local level to have available at some of the public accesses. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she is in favor of Option 1. Option 2 sets a whole new benchmark for levies and that in <br />her view it is too big of a jump financially for the cities and possibly unsustainable over time. <br /> <br />Levang stated Option 2 is concerning and brings into question how the various cities would be able to <br />maintain that level of increase over the years. <br />Nybeck stated it is the LMCD’s intent to get feedback from the cities so the Board can gauge where the <br />level of support is. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the City’s tax base has declined by 24 percent over the past few years, which has resulted <br />in a decrease in the levy for the LMCD. McMillan stated if the City’s tax base increases, the City will be <br />paying more. <br /> <br />Nybeck stated the amount that was being levied over the years versus the maximum level that could be <br />levied was $200,000. Now it is down to $100,000 and it is due in part to declining taxable market values. <br /> <br />Bremer stated in her view it is the wrong time to propose Option 2 but that philosophically she is not <br />opposed to it. Bremer commented the minutes from the LMCD Board meeting reflect that they <br />understand cities are having a harder time financing. <br /> <br />Printup indicated he also is in favor of Option 1 and that it will be interesting to see how it will be <br />projected out in future years. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Item #02 - CC Agenda - 05/28/2013 <br />Approval of Council Minutes 05/13/2013 <br />[Page 24 of 26]